Enable generation of default (0-arguments) constructor when extending classes

L’issue fornisce esempi in JavaScript e Java, ma non indica alcun file sorgente, test o punto di ingresso. Inizia individuando il percorso di generazione dei costruttori per le estensioni delle classi; il lavoro è completato quando un’estensione di una classe base priva di un costruttore senza argomenti può esporre un costruttore senza argomenti generato che delega come specificato, con la copertura del caso mostrato.

If the developer extends a base class with no default constructor, they have no way of explicitly specifying that they want a default constructor code to be generated in Java. This is a certain limitation if the class needs to be declared in the AndroidManifest and is instantiated by the system (attempting to use IntentService is one such case - Android will attempt to create an instance of the implementation of IntentService, but will crash, as it tries to invoke a default constructor, which the developer cannot declare).

Given the following Java class:

package a.b;

public class Base {
    public Base(String a) { ... }       
}

and the following implementation in JavaScript:

a.b.Base.extend("a.b.ExtendedBase", {
    init: function() {
     _this("arbitrary string");      
     // -> will introduce additional logic in the sole ctor block
     // in Java, but will not create an additional constructor
    }  
});

will output

package a.b;

@com.tns.JavaScriptImplementation(javaScriptFile = "./ExtendedBase.js")
public class ExtendedBase extends a.b.Base implements com.tns.NativeScriptHashCodeProvider {
        /* No default constructor */

    public ExtendedBase (java.lang.String param_0){
        super(param_0);
                /* 
                    Additional logic to handle more arguments -> a result of the init function
                */                 
        com.tns.Runtime.initInstance(this);
    }

    public boolean equals__super(java.lang.Object other) {
        return super.equals(other);
    }

    public int hashCode__super() {
        return super.hashCode();
    }
}

Developers have no way to declare a default constructor for a.b.ExtendedBase.

Instead what I need is

package a.b;

@com.tns.JavaScriptImplementation(javaScriptFile = "./ExtendedBase.js")
public class ExtendedBase extends a.b.Base implements com.tns.NativeScriptHashCodeProvider {
        /* default constructor */
        public ExtendedBase () {
        this("Arbitrary String");
    }

    public ExtendedBase (java.lang.String param_0){
        super(param_0);
                /* 
                    Additional logic to handle more arguments -> a result of the init function
                */                 
        com.tns.Runtime.initInstance(this);
    }
}

Generating custom constructors based on the javascript code will require additional analysis, and may not be worth looking into at the moment.