bug(podman): sandbox remains Ready after relay or service forward becomes unavailable
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 30/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Da chiarire
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- rust
- Ambito
- infrastructure, networking
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia con l’harness di riproduzione di Podman e i file referenziati crates/openshell-supervisor-process/src/ssh.rs e crates/openshell-sandbox/src/lib.rs in v0.0.116, quindi raccogli lo stato sanitizzato elencato di gateway, sandbox, forward e Podman. Confronta i cicli di vita di relay, exec e forward durante un errore e un riavvio. Il lavoro è completato quando l’errore è deterministico o è stato ricondotto a un componente, e il comportamento di ripristino o di stato degradato è definito e coperto da evidenze o test.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Summary
This issue reports a possible OpenShell relay and forwarding lifecycle problem observed with the Podman compute driver. It is not specific to AI Guardian. AI Guardian exposed the problem because it uses openshell forward service to reach a daemon running inside the sandbox.
The failure is currently time-dependent and has not been reduced to a deterministic trigger.
Environment
- OpenShell gateway:
0.0.116 - Embedded sandbox supervisor in both affected containers:
openshell-sandbox 0.0.116 - Compute driver: rootless Podman
- Host: Fedora Linux with SELinux enforcing, x86_64
- Two long-lived sandboxes
No usernames, hostnames, home directories, repository paths, container IDs, sandbox UUIDs, credentials, or private URLs are included here.
Observed behavior
After several hours or overnight:
openshell sandbox listcontinued to report both sandboxes asReady.podman psshowed both corresponding containers asUp (healthy).openshell sandbox execand interactive connection attempts failed.- Host-side
openshell forward serviceprocesses were no longer running. openshell forward listshowed stale or dead forward records.- No local listening socket remained for the recorded forward ports.
- The gateway remained healthy, but the sandbox control and service-forward paths were unusable.
No OOM kill or unhealthy container state was observed.
Minimal OpenShell-only observation harness
The following example does not use AI Guardian. It creates a long-lived sandbox containing a simple loopback HTTP service, then forwards that service through OpenShell. Use a disposable sandbox and replace the local port if 43152 is already in use.
Terminal A:
openshell sandbox create \
--name openshell-forward-repro \
--from base \
--no-auto-providers \
-- \
sh -lc 'exec python3 -m http.server 63152 --bind 127.0.0.1'
Terminal B, after the sandbox is ready:
openshell sandbox exec --name openshell-forward-repro --no-tty -- \
sh -lc 'curl --fail --silent --show-error http://127.0.0.1:63152/'
Terminal C, start the host-side service forward and leave it running:
openshell forward service openshell-forward-repro \
--target-host 127.0.0.1 \
--target-port 63152 \
--local 127.0.0.1:43152
In another shell, periodically test the forward and the sandbox control path:
curl --fail --silent --show-error http://127.0.0.1:43152/
openshell sandbox exec --name openshell-forward-repro --no-tty -- true
openshell sandbox list
openshell forward list
For a longer observation, leave the sandbox and forward running for several hours or overnight, then repeat the checks. The failure is considered reproduced if the container remains healthy and the sandbox remains Ready, but the forward process exits or the local port stops listening and subsequent exec or connection requests fail.
Sanitized state evidence
Gateway: openshell
Status: healthy
Version: 0.0.116
Compute drivers: podman (0.0.116)
NAME PHASE
sandbox-a Ready
sandbox-b Ready
Forward records for the affected sandboxes: dead
Podman containers for the affected sandboxes: Up (healthy)
Relevant sanitized logs
The affected run included messages similar to:
[gateway] supervisor session: relay opened successfully
[gateway] relay stream: claimed pending relay, bridging
[sandbox] supervisor session: relay bridge failed
[sandbox] write to target failed: Broken pipe (os error 32)
[gateway] ForwardTcp: inbound stream ended
[sandbox] supervisor session: stream closed by supervisor
[sandbox] supervisor session: ended
During one manual stop/start transition, the sandbox log also contained:
WARN openshell_supervisor_process::netns: Failed to delete network namespace
This line may be secondary to the restart and is not asserted as the root cause.
Relation to existing reports
- #2372 describes the SSH accept loop exiting after transient errors while the sandbox remains
Ready. - #2337 describes a similar proxy accept-loop failure under file-descriptor exhaustion.
- #2587 describes broken-pipe relay failures, although that report is VM-specific.
The 0.0.116 supervisor source contains retry/backoff handling for transient SSH accept errors and monitoring for an unexpected SSH accept-loop exit:
Therefore, this may be a different failure in the host-side openshell forward service or in the relay lifecycle. The captured logs do not contain EMFILE, so file-descriptor exhaustion is only a hypothesis and is not confirmed.
Expected behavior
- A sandbox reported as
Readyshould have workingexec, interactive connection, and required service-forwarding paths. - If a required relay or forward dies, OpenShell should either recover it or mark the sandbox degraded/error instead of leaving it
Ready. - A detached or long-lived forward should have an actionable failure status and a supported recovery or reconciliation mechanism.
- Restarting a sandbox should restore the complete control and forwarding path, or identify exactly which component could not be restored.
Questions
- Can the gateway or Podman supervisor detect and recover a lost relay or service-forward path?
- Is there a health signal that distinguishes a healthy Podman container from a sandbox whose SSH or forwarding relay is unusable?
- Should
openshell forward servicebe supervised or automatically reconciled when the underlying relay closes? - Are there known OpenShell
0.0.116issues involving long-lived Podman sandboxes, repeatedForwardTcptraffic, or forward processes exiting without changing the sandbox phase?
Suggested diagnostics
If this is reproduced, please collect only sanitized output from:
openshell version
openshell gateway info
openshell sandbox list
openshell forward list
openshell logs openshell-forward-repro --since 30m
podman ps -a --filter label=openshell.managed=true
Please redact local usernames, hostnames, filesystem paths, container IDs, sandbox UUIDs, credentials, and private endpoints before attaching logs.
- Lingua principale
- Rust
- Stelle
- 8.7k
- Fork
- 1.3k
- Merge medio
- 2g 8h
- PR unite (30g)
- 271
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di NVIDIA/OpenShell
-
area:docs
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 88/100
-
state:triage-needed
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
-
area:cli state:validated
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
-
state:triage-needed
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 90/100
-
area:build spike state:review-ready state:stale
Difficoltà 2/5 Mezza giornata Idoneità per principianti 68/100
Tutte le issue di NVIDIA/OpenShell
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
-
issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
-
agentic-workflows
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
web-infra-dev/rspack#15847 ·