[BUG]
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Ambito
- computer-vision
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia da docs/deepstream_test/deepstream_test.cpp, in particolare da process_single_file(), e riproduci il crash usando due file H.265 con la stessa risoluzione su DeepStream 9.1. Esegui la variante proposta decoder → nvstreammux → fakesink per determinare se è coinvolta l’inferenza, quindi confronta il ciclo di vita del riavvio e il backtrace con il comportamento segnalato. Il lavoro è completato quando viene isolato il componente che causa il problema oppure viene stabilito il ciclo di vita di riutilizzo supportato.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Issue: nvstreammux SIGSEGV when reusing the same pipeline for a 2nd file after EOS (DS 9.1; works on DS 7.1)
Summary
We run a single DeepStream pipeline (filesrc → h265parse → nvv4l2decoder → nvstreammux → nvinfer → ... → encoder → filesink) and reuse it sequentially for multiple H.265 files: after a file reaches EOS we go GST_STATE_NULL → READY → PLAYING, change filesrc/filesink locations, and play the next file.
This works fine on DeepStream 7.1 (validated with 11 files / 3 resolution groups). On DeepStream 9.1 the same program segfaults at the 2nd file of the first group, inside the closed nvstreammux (libnvdsgst_multistream.so) while the decoder re-negotiates caps into the mux.
We believe nvstreammux cannot be safely reused after an EOS'd source in 9.1 (regression vs 7.1, or a behavior change). Since the nvstreammux source is now in this repo under src/gst-plugins/gst-nvmultistream2, we'd like to report it here.
Environment
| Item | Crashes (DS 9.1 — dev box) | Works (DS 7.1 — prod box) |
|---|---|---|
| DeepStream image | nvcr.io/nvidia/deepstream:9.1-triton-multiarch |
nvcr.io/nvidia/deepstream:7.1-triton-multiarch |
| DeepStream SDK | 9.1 | 7.1 |
| GPU | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (12 GB) | NVIDIA L20 (46 GB) |
| Driver | 610.47.03 (KMD 610.60) | 535.216.01 |
| CUDA | UMD 13.3 | 12.6 |
| Host | x86_64, Windows + WSL2 (Docker Desktop) | x86_64, Linux VM |
| GStreamer | as shipped inside the DS image | as shipped inside the DS image |
| Video codec | H.265 (NV12), 1920x1440 / 1920x1536 / 3840x2160 | same files |
⚠️ Confounding factors / what we have NOT been able to isolate: the two boxes differ not only in DeepStream version but also in GPU (consumer RTX 3060 vs datacenter L20), driver (610 vs 535), CUDA (13.3 vs 12.6) and host (WSL2 vs Linux VM). So the delta is not purely "DS 9.1 vs 7.1". We tried to run the 7.1 image on the dev box but could not: the DeepStream 7.1 container's CUDA runtime is incompatible with that box's newer driver/CUDA stack, and we don't want to downgrade the driver. So this is currently a field report: DS 9.1 + RTX 3060 + driver 610.47.03 / CUDA 13.3 + WSL2 → crashes; DS 7.1 + L20 + driver 535.216.01 / CUDA 12.6 → works.
If it would help isolate the variable, we can additionally run the
9.1-triton-multiarchimage on an L20 (driver-535) box: if it crashes there too, that confirms DS 9.1 independent of the GPU/driver. Happy to try if you'd like that data point.
Behavior
- DS 7.1: all files processed, clean
EOS,[FILE] Done.every time, no crash. - DS 9.1: file #1 OK; at the start of file #2 (same pipeline, same resolution) →
Segmentation fault.
Key log just before the crash (file #2 starting, model reloading):
=== [2/4] ===
[run] Input: .../CAM5.h265
...
nvinfer ... deserialized trt engine from :...cadesen_26.8.1.engine
nvinfer ... Load new model:... sucessfully
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Reproducer
Attached / reference: docs/deepstream_test/deepstream_test.cpp (single file, ~630 lines).
It:
- reads a task file with lines
input_file width height; - groups tasks by resolution;
- builds one pipeline per group (
nvstreammuxconfigured to that resolution); - runs every file in the group through that same pipeline by cycling
NULL → (change filesrc/filesink location) → READY → PLAYING, then waits for EOS.
The reuse step that triggers the bug is in process_single_file():
// next file: fully stop, then restart on the SAME pipeline
gst_element_set_state(g_state.pipeline, GST_STATE_NULL);
gst_element_get_state(g_state.pipeline, NULL, NULL, GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE);
g_usleep(100000);
// drain bus
GstMessage* msg;
while ((msg = gst_bus_pop(g_state.bus)) != NULL)
gst_message_unref(msg);
// point at the next input/output
g_object_set(G_OBJECT(g_state.filesrc), "location", task.input_file.c_str(), NULL);
g_object_set(G_OBJECT(g_state.sink), "location", task.output_file.c_str(), NULL);
gst_element_set_state(g_state.pipeline, GST_STATE_READY);
gst_element_get_state(g_state.pipeline, NULL, NULL, GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE);
gst_element_set_state(g_state.pipeline, GST_STATE_PLAYING);
g_main_loop_run(g_loop); // runs until EOS
Pipeline topology (built once per group):
filesrc → h265parse → nvv4l2decoder ─┐
├─ nvstreammux (sink_0, batch-size=1)
nvinfer ← capsfilter(NV12 WxH) ←─────┘
nvvideoconvert → nvdsosd → nvvideoconvert
→ capsfilter(I420 WxH) → nvv4l2h265enc → filesink
Build
# DeepStream container, e.g.:
g++ -O2 -o deepstream_test deepstream_test.cpp \
$(pkg-config --cflags --libs gstreamer-1.0 glib-2.0 gobject-2.0) \
-I/opt/nvidia/deepstream/deepstream/sources/includes \
-L/opt/nvidia/deepstream/deepstream/lib \
-lnvdsgst_meta -lnvds_meta \
-Wl,-rpath,/opt/nvidia/deepstream/deepstream/lib
Run
./deepstream_test \
-t task.txt \
-o /path/to/output_dir \
-c /opt/nvidia/deepstream/deepstream/samples/configs/deepstream-app/config_infer_primary.txt # any PGIE config
task.txt — two H.265 files of the SAME resolution are enough to trigger it:
/path/video_cam4.h265 1920 1440
/path/video_cam5.h265 1920 1440
Note: the crash appears to be independent of the model content — the fault fires while the decoder re-negotiates caps into the reused nvstreammux, right after the pipeline is restarted for file #2. We have not yet verified whether it reproduces with the inference stage removed entirely (e.g.
decoder → nvstreammux → fakesink); let us know if that minimal variant would help.
Backtrace (gdb, DS 9.1)
Thread 16 "h265-parser:sin" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007f... in g_mutex_lock () from libglib-2.0.so.0
#0 g_mutex_lock () libglib-2.0.so.0
#1 ??? () libnvdsgst_multistream.so <-- nvstreammux
#2 ??? () libgstreamer-1.0.so.0
#3 ??? () libgstreamer-1.0.so.0
#4 ??? () libgstreamer-1.0.so.0
#5 ??? () libgstreamer-1.0.so.0
#6 gst_pad_push_event () libgstreamer-1.0.so.0
#7 ??? () libgstvideo-1.0.so.0
#8 gst_video_decoder_negotiate () libgstvideo-1.0.so.0
#9 ??? () libgstnvvideo4linux2.so <-- nvv4l2decoder
#10 ... (gst_video_decoder chain)
#16 gst_base_parse_push_frame () libgstbase-1.0.so.0
#17 ??? () libgstvideoparsersbad.so <-- h265parse
Decoder re-negotiation on the restart pushes an event into nvstreammux, which locks a mutex on (apparently) stale per-source state from the EOS'd source → SIGSEGV.
Expected vs actual
- Expected: after EOS, cycling
NULL → READY → PLAYINGand pointingfilesrcat a new file on the same nvstreammux pipeline should start the new stream cleanly (as it does on DS 7.1). - Actual: on DS 9.1 the 2nd file segfaults inside nvstreammux during caps negotiation.
Questions / possible cause
- Is reusing one
nvstreammuxpipeline across back-to-back EOS'd file streams supported in 9.1 at all? If not, what is the recommended way to process multiple files sequentially without rebuilding the mux? - The crash looks like a per-source object/mutex is freed or reset on EOS but still referenced by the decoder during the next negotiation — i.e. a use-after-free/race between the state change and the streaming thread inside
nvstreammux.
- Lingua principale
- C++
- Stelle
- 270
- Fork
- 59
- Merge medio
- 1h 32m
- PR unite (30g)
- 5
Preparare l'ambiente
Questo progetto non fornisce container di sviluppo, Dockerfile né guida per i contributori, quindi l'ambiente è a tuo carico: parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di NVIDIA/DeepStream
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 84/100
NVIDIA/DeepStream#78 ·
Tutte le issue di NVIDIA/DeepStream
Issue simili
-
Incorrect Link in README.mdForse già presa Una pull request collegata a questa issue è aperta o già unita. Aperta
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 95/100
flameshot-org/flameshot#4996 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 64/100
utopia-rise/godot-jvm#1004 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
chore(build): TxCoordinator.cpp uses the deprecated shared_ptr atomic free functionsForse già presa @w5jwp l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 84/100
aethersdr/AetherSDR#6368 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno