[Pattern Idea] Maintainer Apprentice
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 25/100
- Tipo di issue
- Documentazione
- Chiarezza
- Da chiarire
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Stack tecnologico
- github, markdown
- Ambito
- documentation
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia dall’issue #670 e dall’istanza nota collegata #669, quindi esamina il contesto di CODEOWNERS e dei ruoli personalizzati del repository descritto nell’issue. Un pattern completo dovrebbe completare la sezione incompiuta Resulting Context e documentare chiaramente il problema maintainer-apprentice, i compromessi, le soluzioni e il risultato.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Title
Maintainer Apprentice
Patlet / Summary
A user wants to work their way into becoming an Approver/Maintainer on an InnerSource repository while being given enough permissions to prove their contributions.
Problem
Sometimes a repository may want to "onboard" maintainers without giving them full write access. This means they are added to a repository to provide content/changes and able to "approve" other changes but not merge them. This could be a form of onboarding or internship on the way to approver or maintainer roles.
Context
From @spier in #669
...our idea with the lower section of the CODEOWNERS file was, that those folks doing the translation work might sort of be "maintainer apprentice", and through their involvement in the project become maintainers eventually
In this particular situation the user was in the CODEOWNERS file but did not have write permissions on the repository. This caused GitHub to label the CODEOWNERS file as having errors.
Forces
What could make this problem difficult?
- the permissions structure in the organization or repository is not present to solve this
Tradeoff(s):
- Knowing a "maintainer apprentice" is given enough permissions to contribute and approve but not merge changes.
Solutions
Any of the following:
- Make sure all reviewers/approvers/maintainers of repositories have write permissions
- Accepting that not all reviewers/approvers/maintainers of repositories have write permissions until earned
- Custom repository or organization roles (if the software allows it) (e.g, Custom Repository Roles)
Resulting Context
What is the situation after the problem has been solved?
The original context is changed indirectly by way of the solution.
Often this section can include discussion of the next possible Patterns/problems introduced.
This section can be short in content - the solution may not introduce new problems or change much context.
Known Instances (optional)
#669
Status
Initial
Author(s) (optional)
@spier
@jmeridth
- Lingua principale
- HTML
- Stelle
- 853
- Fork
- 206
- Merge medio
- 1g 23h
- PR unite (30g)
- 2
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns
-
community metrics
InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns#935 · 1 assegnatario ·
-
community metrics
InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns#934 · 1 assegnatario ·
-
community metrics
InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns#922 · 1 assegnatario ·
-
community metrics
InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns#921 · 1 assegnatario ·
-
community metrics
InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns#915 · 1 assegnatario ·
Tutte le issue di InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns
Issue simili
-
Add: hunch Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
AbdelStark/awesome-typesafe#104 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
-
A11y ♿️
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
-
Link Checker Report Apertaautomated issue report
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 85/100
-
documentation improve or update documentation priority/low triage
Difficoltà 2/5 Mezza giornata Idoneità per principianti 86/100
warpdotdev/docs#782 · 1 commento ·