feat: Per benchmark instance properties
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
@christian-pinto ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 7/10/2026.
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.
Descrizione
Motivation
Given a problem class with some general properties that define it, there may be a variety of "free" variables that one could set to generate instances of the problem. For example I create an instance with all the problem class properties but I add an additional "penalty" property.
At the moment I would have to do one of two things to add such an instance
- Not mention this penalty property (maybe just in description). It will not be in any table etc.
- Create a new problem class that is same as existing except with the penalty property
The first is problematic as I can't see this additional property in any table. The second is annoying as I have to keep adding problem class whenever I want to try setting some additional parameter or constraint on my instance.
Proposed Solution
Allow instances to define their own "generative" property and associated values. This is additional information used to create an instance that matches the general structure of the problem class but with instance specific features. These properties could be shown in the instance table view but hidden in the problem class view.
The overall benefit is to have more flexibility in the type of benchmark instances that can be added under a problem class.
Additional Context
This does bring the question of an ever expanding tree of instances.
That is someone else comes along with an instance that also has same extra features as my instance but different values. With above solution you would not see these as related. You could then request that these should be related so you want an "instance class" as well as "problem class" in the taxonomy, but then you can always have same problem again.
The proposed solution to this is to just to keep the two levels (problem class and instance) and let instances have their free parameters. If many instances are added with the same free parameters and it's deemed that they need to be collected together so we can create tables with all then a new problem class is created.
Additionally by allowing the user to create in UI a custom "query key" it should be possible for them to aggregate any data they want, addressing niche use cases without having to add additional structure.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 4
- Fork
- 7
- Merge medio
- 21h 28m
- PR unite (30g)
- 26
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di IBM/algorithm-nexus
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
IBM/algorithm-nexus#159 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
feat: allow specifying multiple values for properties in an instanceForse già presa @christian-pinto l’ha presa 14 giorni fa. Apertaenhancement
IBM/algorithm-nexus#277 · 1 commento · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
docs: improve readmeAperta
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 68/100
IBM/algorithm-nexus#276 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 45/100
IBM/algorithm-nexus#254 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Test bmfm-targets with vllm >= 0.29.0Forse di nuovo libera @sivanravidos l’ha presa 31 giorni fa e non c’è nessuna pull request aperta. Aperta
IBM/algorithm-nexus#240 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di IBM/algorithm-nexus
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 1/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 87/100
adri0/scadustats#128 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
`TIMESTAMP`, `TIMESTAMP_NTZ`, `TINYINT` and the other `TypeDecorator`s don't declare `python_type`Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
-
RPBCApertaawaiting policy acceptance precheck-passed
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 78/100
Bioconductor/BiocContributions#240 · 1 commento ·
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
documentation good first issue launch
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 83/100
FlologixAI/etchwork#4 ·