Improve weekly link checker reports and failure tracking
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 43/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start with .github/workflows/link-checker.yml and the linked weekly reports #365–#376 to understand how the workflow checks URLs and creates reports. Implement the report lifecycle and verification behavior described in the acceptance criteria, then validate unchanged, new, resolved, removed or excluded, blocked or rate-limited, and clean-run cases. Done means one open report tracks failure history, redirects are informational, and 403/429 checks are not silently treated as verified.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
The weekly link checker creates a new issue for each failing run and includes successful redirects alongside failures. Repeated failures make new problems harder to notice. The workflow also globally accepts HTTP 403 and 429 responses, which can hide inaccessible or unverified links.
The eight weekly reports from 6 September–25 October 2026 show why this matters:
| URL | Failed reports |
|---|---|
cid.contact/routing/v1/providers/ (incomplete documentation example) |
8/8 |
cha-ching.it (timeout) |
Latest 5 |
geoweb.network (TLS handshake failure) |
Latest 3 |
FilecoinWarmStorageService.sol source URL (404) |
First appears in #376 |
Reports: #365, #367, #368, #369, #372, #373, #374, #376.
Improve .github/workflows/link-checker.yml in three areas:
- Maintain one open report with failure history. Update the existing report instead of creating duplicate weekly issues. Show new, persistent, and resolved failures, with first-seen and last-checked information and the latest workflow-run link.
- Separate actionable failures from redirects. Put failures first and keep successful redirects in a collapsed informational section. Distinguish expected functional redirects (Google Forms submission endpoint, Cloudflare script, GitHub login) from ordinary webpage redirects worth updating.
- Review blanket acceptance of HTTP 403 and 429. Retry rate limits appropriately, respecting
Retry-Afterwhere available, and surface checks that remain blocked or unverified. Any exceptions should have a documented, narrow URL scope and reason.
Acceptance criteria:
- Consecutive runs with the same failures update the existing open report without creating another issue.
- New and persistent failures are clearly distinguished, with first-seen and last-checked information.
- Previously failing URLs are marked resolved only after successful verification; removals and exclusions are identified separately.
- Successful redirects are informational and do not appear as broken links; the full report and workflow-run URL remain available.
- HTTP 403/429 responses are not silently counted as verified working links; narrowly scoped exceptions are documented.
- A clean run updates or closes the outstanding report.
- Validate the report lifecycle with unchanged failures, a new failure, a successful recheck, a removed/excluded URL, blocked/rate-limited checks, and a clean run.
Individual link corrections and the incomplete CID-example exclusion are handled separately in draft PR #392.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 4
- Fork
- 10
- Merge medio
- 4h 10m
- PR unite (30g)
- 13
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Nessuna guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di FilOzone/filecoin-cloud
-
Link Checker ReportApertabroken-links
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 58/100
FilOzone/filecoin-cloud#393 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 30/100
FilOzone/filecoin-cloud#338 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Link Checker ReportApertabroken-links
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 52/100
FilOzone/filecoin-cloud#315 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
No validation for network configuration JSON (contract addresses, duplicate active versions, schema)Forse di nuovo libera @DarkLord017 l’ha presa 350 giorni fa e non c’è nessuna pull request aperta. Aperta
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
FilOzone/filecoin-cloud#48 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di FilOzone/filecoin-cloud
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
community first-timers-only good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted low hanging fruit up-for-grabs
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 82/100
lingdojo/kana-dojo#33947 · 1 commento · 5 reazioni ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
paperclipai/paperclip#20942 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
area: documentation good first issue package: rule-data status: accepting prs
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
status: needs triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 85/100
mastra-ai/mastra#30109 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno