[Bug]: The Human criterion shown on the inception page cannot be ticked there, and nothing says where it can
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 72/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start with web/templates/inception_detail.html, especially the acceptance-criteria section around lines 360–364, and compare how criteria are rendered on the task page. Check how the existing checkbox and toggle-ac behavior is wired before choosing whether to add working checkboxes or links to /tasks/T-XXX. Done when the Human criterion can be completed from the inception flow or the page clearly directs operators to the task page.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Bug Description
The inception page (/inception/T-XXX) is where the operator is sent to decide. It shows the task's Acceptance Criteria, including the ### Human criterion, as plain text: <li>[ ] [REVIEW] ..., with no input. The operator sees a box, clicks it, and nothing happens.
The working checkbox exists on /tasks/T-XXX (and /approvals) only. The inception page does not link to /tasks/T-XXX; its only link to those places is the generic /approvals navigation entry.
Consequence observed on 1.8.3: the operator recorded GO from the inception page, which shows the objectives he was approving. The decision was saved, but the [REVIEW] Human criterion of the same task stayed unticked, so fw inception sweep answered "ticked but 1 Human AC still unchecked — stays in active/" and the task could not leave active/. Once the operator found /tasks/T-XXX and ticked the box there, the sweep completed the task.
Steps to Reproduce
- Open
/inception/T-XXXfor an inception task that has an unticked### Humancriterion. - Try to tick the criterion in the "Acceptance Criteria" card.
- Look for a link to the page where it can be ticked.
Expected Behavior
Either the criterion can be ticked on the page where the decision is taken, or the page (and the "decision is saved" message) says that one more click is needed and links to /tasks/T-XXX.
Actual Behavior
On the served inception page (1.8.6): no type="checkbox" input, no toggle-ac request target, no href="/tasks/T-XXX". The criterion is rendered as:
<li>[ ] [REVIEW] Review exploration findings and approve go/no-go decision
On /tasks/T-XXX for the same task, the checkbox inputs and the toggle-ac targets are present.
fw doctor output
AI Agent
Claude Code
Operating System
Linux
Additional Context
Version: 1.8.6 (1ea10441f), vendored consumer. The rendering was checked on the served pages of 1.8.6. The consequence on the decide chain (task stuck in active/) was observed on 1.8.3 and not replayed on 1.8.6.
web/templates/inception_detail.html, lines 360 to 364: {{ sections.acceptance_criteria }} in a plain section card.
Suggestions:
- Render the Human criteria of the inception page with the same working checkboxes as the task page.
- Or link each criterion, and the "decision is saved" message, to
/tasks/T-XXX.
- Lingua principale
- Shell
- Stelle
- 16
- Fork
- 6
- Merge medio
- 6h 24m
- PR unite (30g)
- 5
Preparare l'ambiente
- Include un Dockerfile o un file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework
-
area:cli bug severity:low status:fixed-on-bleeding-edge triaged
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#100 · 5 commenti ·
-
area:cli bug severity:medium status:fixed-on-bleeding-edge triaged
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#97 · 5 commenti ·
-
area:context bug severity:low status:fixed-on-bleeding-edge triaged
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#96 · 5 commenti ·
-
area:docs bug severity:medium status:in-progress triaged
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#95 · 4 commenti ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 64/100
Tutte le issue di DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework
Issue simili
-
Security: Vulnerable PHP version (CVE-2026-109618 / CVE-2026-109619) in current Docker imagesAperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
MISP/misp-docker#478 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 78/100
t4t5/omdrop-owl#83 ·
-
Link Checker ReportApertaautomated issue report
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 88/100
a2aproject/A2A#2383 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
roadmap-100
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 80/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
priority: medium status: needs-decision work-class: scoped
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#9339 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno