Bucket information is sometimes unavailable from api instance

Aperta
#266 1 commento 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
3/5
Tempo stimato
1-2 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
22/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Ferma
Stack tecnologico
python
Ambito
api, backend

Direzione di ricerca

The inconsistency sits between b2sdk/bucket.py, where the server response is parsed (around line 970 in the linked v1.9.0 code), and b2sdk/api.py, where a bucket is built from only its id and name when read from the cache (around line 325). Start by reproducing the missing bucketType in as_dict() for a cached bucket. Done means cached and server-fetched buckets report the same fields, or the maintainers pick a design such as caching the full bucket data or fetching on demand. The thread has had no comments in about five years, so confirm the approach with maintainers first.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

I have observed application behaviour wherein I'm unable to determine if my bucket is private or not.
If I look at the bucket.as_dict() I can see that "bucketType" as a property is missing.

{'accountId': 'ececece343434', 'bucketId': 'aoeuaoeuaoeu', 'bucketName': 'some-public-bucket', 'bucketInfo': {}, 'corsRules': [], 'lifecycleRules': [], 'revision': None, 'options': set(), 'defaultServerSideEncryption': {'mode': None}, 'isFileLockEnabled': None, 'defaultRetention': {'mode': 'unknown'}}

This is confusing because when retrieving a server response, it looks like this information is checked: https://github.com/Backblaze/b2-sdk-python/blob/v1.9.0/b2sdk/bucket.py#L970

Yet from the cache, it's constructed with solely id and name: https://github.com/Backblaze/b2-sdk-python/blob/v1.9.0/b2sdk/api.py#L325

This leads to an inconsistent experience when interacting with a bucket instance as pulled from the api.

Perhaps the entire bucket dict should be cached? Alternatively that data retrieved on-demand? Not sure.

For now my workaround is to call:
b2_api.session.cache.clear() and retry the call to get_bucket to refresh the data, although I'll have to leave it for some time to see if it fully works.

Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
214
Fork
68
Merge medio
51m
PR unite (30g)
6

Preparare l'ambiente

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di Backblaze/b2-sdk-python

Tutte le issue di Backblaze/b2-sdk-python

Issue simili

Altre issue su Python

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.