Adopt the AI-native SDLC playbook and repository policies
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 25/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start by reading the referenced intent/review-process/intent.md, noxfile.py, ci.yml, and README.release.md, then compare the listed review lessons with the existing repository policies and CI jobs. The work spans contributor guidance, local CI and changelog checks, release and community policies, AI-native planning materials, and a maintainer review proposal; done means these deliverables are implemented and the repo-admin decisions are resolved.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Problem
More B2 CLI PRs are now written with coding agents, and the repo gives them nothing to read before they start. Reviewers keep asking for the same things: a changelog.d fragment (#1137, #957, #905), a fragment ending in a full stop (#1044), the right fragment type with internal changes kept out of user sections (#1137, #763), behavior changes such as exit codes called out for script users (#1165), a focused test for every input branch of a fix (#1165, #924), developer-only knobs kept out of the main --help (#1163), and stdout/stderr treated as a contract (--quiet, stderr monitored by users; #924, #1000, #1180). Several PRs were also held up by live-B2 integration flakiness on master that was not the PR's fault (#1062, #1125, #1167).
There is no single local command that mirrors CI (codespell, nox -s lint, the changelog checks, build, unit and integration tests), so contributors find failures after pushing. The release steps live in a two-line README.release.md and in noxfile.py. The repo also lacks the standard policy files: no SECURITY.md, CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, issue forms or PR template.
Proposed outcome
- Agents and contributors read the recurring review lessons before they write code (
AGENTS.md, withCLAUDE.mdpointing to it), and reviewers follow one written process (REVIEW.md). - One local command,
nox -s ci, that mirrors the CI lint, build and test jobs, plus a localnox -s changelog_checkthat matches the CI "Validate new changelog entries" step. towncrier stays as the changelog tool. - A documented release process (
RELEASE.md, replacingREADME.release.md), a security policy, a code of conduct, issue forms and a PR template. - Larger changes start from
intent/<slug>/intent.md→spec.md→plan.md, following the AI-native SDLC playbook, with the playbook skills in.claude/skills/and aruff formathook for Claude Code edits. - A proposal, for the maintainers to decide, on scaling human review by risk (tiers by path, re-approval on new commits, required conversation resolution, automated AI and security review, merge queue, reviewer evals, metrics).
No CLI behavior changes.
Settings that need a repo admin
- Enable private vulnerability reporting (needed by
SECURITY.mdand the issue form's security link). - Decide whether to add a
.github/CODEOWNERSfile, and who is in it. - Confirm which branch protection is applied to
master. - Decide whether Dependabot PRs should keep running the full CI matrix (live-B2 secrets) or be gated.
- Fix the codespell step in
ci.yml:ignore_words_list: datas re-useis space-separated, so the action passesre-useas the path to check and codespell checks nothing. Usedatas,re-useand fix the existing typos it then finds. - Review
intent/review-process/intent.mdand accept, reshape or close it.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 638
- Fork
- 138
- Merge medio
- 8h 27m
- PR unite (30g)
- 8
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di Backblaze/B2_Command_Line_Tool
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
Backblaze/B2_Command_Line_Tool#553 · 2 commenti · 3 reazioni ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 25/100
Backblaze/B2_Command_Line_Tool#1168 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Add to MacPortsAperta
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 50/100
Backblaze/B2_Command_Line_Tool#1161 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 56/100
Backblaze/B2_Command_Line_Tool#1155 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
more-information-needed
Difficoltà 3/5 Mezza giornata Idoneità per principianti 42/100
Backblaze/B2_Command_Line_Tool#1142 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di Backblaze/B2_Command_Line_Tool
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 72/100
btclib-org/btclib-node#2505 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
open-webui/open-webui#34462 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
gorakhargosh/watchdog#1462 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 85/100
openwisp/openwisp-monitoring#889 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
IETF-Hackathon/pqc-certificates#351 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni