feat: Native Intent → Execution → Evidence foundation with optional ISEE governance
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
@suuus ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 7/10/2026.
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.
Descrizione
Summary
Establish a portable governance foundation for Git-Ape that records deployment
Intent, captures what actually executed, and preserves immutable Evidence without
requiring the ISEE suite to be installed.
ISEE remains an optional governance and independent-verification layer that can
be installed before or after Git-Ape records are created.
Motivation
Git-Ape already performs security, cost, architecture, approval, deployment, and
validation stages. However, these stages need portable, machine-readable records
that preserve:
- what was intended;
- which execution path actually occurred;
- which artifacts and control results were produced;
- who or what authorized the deployment;
- whether records were independently governed or verified.
These records should remain useful without introducing a mandatory runtime or
package dependency.
Scope
- Save onboarding and deployment Intent as ADRP-compatible draft records.
- Declare versioned deployment execution graphs.
- Capture immutable, graph-bound execution traces.
- Derive CI traces from actual workflow step outcomes.
- Label interactive traces as
agent-observed. - Emit immutable AERP-compatible Evidence bundles for successful and failed runs.
- Bind Evidence to exact artifact bytes and archived graph versions.
- Support delayed adoption by ADRP, ASRP, and AERP tooling.
- Preserve truthful lifecycle states:
- native Intent is
draft; - native Evidence is
generated; - only authoritative tooling may ratify or independently verify records.
- native Intent is
- Retain Git-Ape's existing Bash,
jq, and SHA-256 dependency baseline.
Relationship to #148
#148 delivers the structured execution-trace portion of this foundation.
The trace implementation deliberately uses workflow-owned reconstruction in CI
rather than requiring agents to self-report their own completeness. Interactive
agent observations remain supported, but are explicitly identified as
agent-observed and are not represented as independent proof.
The Intent, trace, Evidence, and optional ISEE integration are tightly connected
and may be delivered through one implementation PR referencing both issues.
Acceptance criteria
- Onboarding preserves platform Intent as an ADRP-compatible draft.
- Each deployment preserves deployment-specific Intent before execution.
- Each workflow attempt receives an immutable invocation identity.
- The exact execution graph used by each attempt is archived.
- Traces are bound to the archived graph digest.
- Trace validation checks nodes, transitions, receipts, ordering, continuity,
required successful nodes, and terminal outcomes. - Failed attempts can produce valid traces ending at the failed node.
- Evidence bundles include trace, validation, graph, state, test, and relevant
deployment artifacts. - Evidence is emitted for successful and failed attempts.
- Optional ISEE adoption validates existing records without regenerating or
automatically ratifying them. - Record or Evidence failures do not rewrite Azure deployment lifecycle state.
- Native operation introduces no runtime dependency beyond existing Bash/
jq
tooling. - Scaffolding, tests, evaluations, and user documentation cover the lifecycle.
- Lingua principale
- JavaScript
- Stelle
- 269
- Fork
- 48
- Merge medio
- 2g 19h
- PR unite (30g)
- 15
Preparare l'ambiente
Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di Azure/git-ape
-
daily-status report
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 15/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
agentic-workflows workshop workshop-sync
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 1/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
report workshop-coverage
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 1/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
agentic-workflows
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 25/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
agentic-workflows
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 35/100
Azure/git-ape#370 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
Tutte le issue di Azure/git-ape
Issue simili
-
bug(sight): the dashboard's text truncations split surrogate pairs and show broken charactersApertacomponent:sight
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
agentic-os-org/ANOLISA#6738 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug Durable Agents Observability (AI Telemetry) status: needs triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
mastra-ai/mastra#26470 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
feature/cohorts feature/feature-flags team/feature-flags
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
documentation good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
Orbit-xyz/orbit-docs#11 ·
-
area/build area/tech debt
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni