[BUG] KeyVaultEnvironmentPostProcessor cannot load configured property-sources in Spring Boot 4 AOT / GraalVM native image
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.
Descrizione
Describe the bug
When using Spring Cloud Azure Key Vault Secrets with Spring Boot 4.1.x and GraalVM native image, KeyVaultEnvironmentPostProcessor runs during native/AOT startup before the configured Key Vault property-sources are available in the Environment.
The same configuration works correctly when the application is started normally on the JVM.
During native startup, the processor logs:
KeyVaultEnvironmentPostProcessor : Skip configuring Key Vault PropertySource because spring.cloud.azure.keyvault.secret.property-sources is empty.
However, later during the same application startup, the configuration is present in the Spring Environment:
spring.cloud.azure.keyvault.secret.property-source-enabled=true
spring.cloud.azure.keyvault.secret.property-sources[0].name=vault
spring.cloud.azure.keyvault.secret.property-sources[0].endpoint=https://example.vault.azure.net/
As a result, the Key Vault PropertySource is never registered and placeholders referring to Key Vault secrets remain unresolved.
For example:
clientSecret=${IClientSecret}
remains the literal value ${IClientSecret} in the native image, whereas on the JVM the secret is resolved correctly.
Exception or Stack Trace
No exception is thrown by KeyVaultEnvironmentPostProcessor.
Instead, during Spring Boot AOT / GraalVM native startup, the processor silently skips Key Vault configuration:
DEBUG KeyVaultEnvironmentPostProcessor :
Skip configuring Key Vault PropertySource because spring.cloud.azure.keyvault.secret.property-sources is empty.
Later during the same startup, the same configuration is present in the Spring Environment:
spring.cloud.azure.keyvault.secret.property-source-enabled=true
spring.cloud.azure.keyvault.secret.property-sources[0].name=vault
spring.cloud.azure.keyvault.secret.property-sources[0].endpoint=https://example.vault.azure.net/
As a consequence, the Key Vault PropertySource is never registered and the secret placeholder remains unresolved:
secretPresent=true
secretLength=15
secretUnresolved=true
For reference, 15 is the length of the unresolved literal:
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
- Use the following versions:
Spring Boot: 4.1.2
Spring Cloud Azure: 7.4.0
spring-cloud-azure-starter-keyvault-secrets: 7.4.0
azure-identity: 1.18.4
azure-security-keyvault-secrets: 4.11.1
Java: 25
GraalVM Native Image: Java 25
GraalVM Native Build Tools: 1.1.14 - Configure Key Vault Secrets in application.yml:
spring:
cloud:
azure:
keyvault:
secret:
property-source-enabled: true
property-sources:
- name: vault
endpoint: "${KEYVAULT_ENDPOINT}"
- Reference a secret from Key Vault:
insights:
security:
clientSecret: "${IClientSecret}"
- Run the application normally on the JVM.
The Key Vault property source is registered successfully:
PropertySource: vault
(com.azure.spring.cloud.autoconfigure.implementation.keyvault.environment.KeyVaultPropertySource)
The secret is resolved correctly:
secretPresent=true
secretUnresolved=false
- Build and run the same application as a GraalVM native image using Spring AOT.
The native application logs:
Skip configuring Key Vault PropertySource because spring.cloud.azure.keyvault.secret.property-sources is empty.
but later the same properties are visible in the Spring Environment.
We also verified processor ordering:
ConfigDataEnvironmentPostProcessor.getOrder()
= -2147483638
KeyVaultEnvironmentPostProcessor.getOrder()
= -2147483637
The Azure processor is therefore ordered after Spring Boot ConfigData processing.
The native executable also contains the expected Azure spring.factories registration, and KeyVaultEnvironmentPostProcessor is definitely executed.
Code Snippet
Minimal configuration :
spring:
cloud:
azure:
keyvault:
secret:
property-source-enabled: true
property-sources:
- name: vault
endpoint: "${KEYVAULT_ENDPOINT}"
frauscher:
insights:
security:
clientSecret: "${IClientSecret}"
Diagnostic code used to verify the behavior:
println(
"secretUnresolved=" +
securityProperties.clientSecret?.contains("\${")
)
environment.propertySources.forEach {
println("PropertySource: ${it.name} (${it.javaClass.name})")
}
println(
"property-source-enabled=" +
environment.getProperty(
"spring.cloud.azure.keyvault.secret.property-source-enabled"
)
)
println(
"property-sources[0].name=" +
environment.getProperty(
"spring.cloud.azure.keyvault.secret.property-sources[0].name"
)
)
println(
"property-sources[0].endpoint=" +
environment.getProperty(
"spring.cloud.azure.keyvault.secret.property-sources[0].endpoint"
)
)
Expected behavior
The GraalVM native application should behave the same as the JVM application.
KeyVaultEnvironmentPostProcessor should see the configured property-sources, register the Key Vault PropertySource, and resolve Key Vault-backed placeholders at runtime.
The native image should remain environment-independent, with Key Vault endpoint and credentials supplied at deployment/runtime.
Screenshots
Not applicable. Relevant DEBUG output is included above.
Setup (please complete the following information):
- OS: Linux
- IDE: IntelliJ
- Library/Libraries:
Spring Boot: 4.1.2 ,Spring Framework: 7.0.x, Spring Cloud Azure: 7.4.0, spring-cloud-azure-starter-keyvault-secrets:7.4.0, spring-cloud-azure-autoconfigure:7.4.0, Azure Identity: 1.18.4, Azure Key Vault Secrets SDK: 4.11.1, Java: 25, GraalVM Native Image: Java 25 / GraalVM 25.x,
GraalVM Native Build Tools: 1.1.14
- Lingua principale
- Java
- Stelle
- 2.6k
- Fork
- 2.2k
- Merge medio
- 1g 17h
- PR unite (30g)
- 259
Preparare l'ambiente
Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di Azure/azure-sdk-for-java
-
mgmt, in track 1 migration guide, call out that file-based authentication method is not recommendedForse di nuovo libera Una pull request per questa issue è stata chiusa senza essere unita. ApertaAzure.Identity
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 74/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#48894 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
needs-triage
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 25/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#51237 · 1 commento · 1 reazione ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
needs-triage
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 25/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#51221 · 1 commento · 1 reazione ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
needs-triage
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 57/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#51215 · 1 commento · 2 reazioni ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[BUG] IllegalStateException when cancelling Service Bus session acquisition on a Reactor threadApertaClient customer-reported needs-team-attention question Service Attention Service Bus
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 56/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#51213 · 2 commenti · 1 reazione ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di Azure/azure-sdk-for-java
Issue simili
-
bug emitter:client:csharp
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
microsoft/typespec#12572 · 1 commento · 1 reazione ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
GCC 15.2: -Wcast-qual warning - cast discards const qualifier from pointer target type (H5trace.c)Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 73/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug] RemotingHelper.connect swaps the socket send and receive buffer configurationForse già presa @amalsaidov l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
needs-area-label
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
area/ai area/backend component/zeebe kind/task
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno