The `prompuff` command and MCP setups from each Linux package
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 72/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- csharp, linux
- Domain
- backend-api-design, cli, desktop, testing
Research direction
Read src/Prompuff.App/Platform/CommandLineInstaller.cs and McpClientSetup.cs, then inspect CommandLineInstallerTests.cs and IntegrationsTests.cs. Trace how install type affects CLI detection and the generated MCP setup, including the Flatpak command and setups from #51. Done means copied .deb setup works with claude mcp add and tests cover every install type.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
The command-line tool and the MCP setups assume an install that Prompuff manages. A package puts things in other places.
What to do
- A
.debor AUR copy already putsprompuffon the PATH, so Settings › Integrations shows it as installed rather than offering Install command-line tool. - A Flatpak runs the CLI as
flatpak run --command=prompuff <app id>, so its MCP setups use that command. - The ready-to-paste MCP setups use the right command for each install type, from #51.
Where to look
src/Prompuff.App/Platform/CommandLineInstaller.cs:IsInstalled,CommandPath,NeedsPathSetupsrc/Prompuff.App/Platform/McpClientSetup.cstests/Prompuff.App.Tests/CommandLineInstallerTests.csandIntegrationsTests.cs
Done when
- From a
.debinstall,claude mcp addwith the copied setup searches the library through MCP. - Tests cover the setups for each install type.
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 1h 21m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 22
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from hazeliscoding/prompuff
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
hazeliscoding/prompuff#34 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
hazeliscoding/prompuff#22 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
hazeliscoding/prompuff#14 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
good first issue
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 92/100
hazeliscoding/prompuff#13 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
hazeliscoding/prompuff#12 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in hazeliscoding/prompuff
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Nimblesite/SharpLsp#468 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
elastic/ecs-dotnet#575 ·
-
alerts bug effort:S P2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
nightscout/nocturne#2511 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Crash in v3.00Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
arkane-systems/mousejiggler#140 ·