Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Comprehension macros are O(n²) in cel-rust 0.14.5; upstream fix for `map` is on master

Open
#57 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
45/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
python, rust

Research direction

Wait for cel-rust 0.14.6 or 0.15, then bump it and rerun the cs/c cases in the #45 prototype's bench.py. Check whether the upstream map fix also covers filter, all, exists, and exists_one; add the 10,000-element performance check in tests/test_performance_verification.py and update the standard-library reference if large-list comprehensions remain slow.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

enhancement

Found while benchmarking for #45. Executing items.filter(i, i % 3 == 0).map(i, i * i).size() against a Context holding an int list scales quadratically with the list length (release build, min of repeats):

elements time per execute
1,000 17 ms
2,000 66 ms
4,000 251 ms
8,000 940 ms
20,000 5.8 s

Each doubling costs ~4×. cel-rust 0.14.5's comprehension macros rebuild the accumulator list on every append (Value::List is an Arc<Vec<_>>, so appending clones the vector), which makes map/filter over anything beyond a few thousand elements unusable. Nothing in this wrapper contributes; a dict context and a Context behave identically.

Upstream already has the fix for map on master, unreleased: cel-rust/cel-rust#341 "perf(macros): map mutates List in place" (merged 2026-09-13, on top of "perf(map): Added mutable List used in map"). It is not clear from the PR title whether filter, all, exists and exists_one got the same treatment.

To do

  • When the next cel-rust release (0.14.6 or 0.15) ships, bump and re-run the table above; add a test in tests/test_performance_verification.py that pins a comprehension over a 10,000-element list under a generous bound (say 200 ms) so a regression is caught.
  • If filter is still quadratic after the bump, raise it upstream with the numbers.
  • Until then the standard-library reference should say that comprehensions over large lists are slow in the current cel-rust, since policy engines routinely filter lists of thousands of records.

Benchmark script: the cs/c cases in the #45 prototype's bench.py (measured on 4 cores).

Dominant language
Python
Stars
43
Forks
4
Avg merge
9h 57m
Merged PRs (30d)
14

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from hardbyte/python-common-expression-language

All issues in hardbyte/python-common-expression-language

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.