Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Naive datetime values are interpreted in the host's local time zone

Open
#50 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
python, rust
Domain
api, backend

Research direction

Start at RustyPyType::try_into_value and inspect the datetime conversion, then review the Python API reference, quick-start guide, tutorials, and Context.add_variable docstring examples. Compare the three proposed naive-datetime policies with existing behavior and project direction. Done means the policy is agreed, implemented if required, and all affected documentation examples consistently reflect it.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Behaviour

Converting a Python value to a CEL timestamp (in RustyPyType::try_into_value) handles a timezone-aware datetime correctly, but a naive one is passed through chrono::Local, so the same datetime(2026, 1, 1, 12) is a different instant on a UTC server and on a developer's laptop. CEL timestamps are absolute instants, and every timestamp(...) literal an expression builds is UTC, so comparisons like created > timestamp("2026-01-01T00:00:00Z") silently depend on TZ.

datetime.now() (naive) is the common way to hit this. The quick-start guide, the tutorials and the Context.add_variable docstring all use naive datetime.now() as the example value, so the docs currently teach the footgun.

Options

  1. Keep local, document loudly. Matches Python's own convention (naive.timestamp() assumes local time). Least disruptive; add a warning box to the Python API reference and the datetime section of the tutorial, and switch the doc examples to datetime.now(timezone.utc).
  2. Treat naive as UTC. Deterministic across machines and matches what most server code means. Silent behaviour change for anyone relying on option 1.
  3. Reject naive datetimes with a ValueError that says to attach a tzinfo. Loudest and safest; a breaking change for existing callers.

My lean is 1 now (with the doc examples fixed) and 3 at the 1.0 boundary, since a policy engine that gives different answers per host TZ is the kind of bug that only shows up in production. Opinions welcome before anything changes.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
43
Forks
4
Avg merge
9h 57m
Merged PRs (30d)
14

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from hardbyte/python-common-expression-language

All issues in hardbyte/python-common-expression-language

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.