Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

A way to add custom filters not specific to fields

Open
#409 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
30/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
graphql, python, sqlalchemy

Research direction

Start with the current filter setup in graphene-sqlalchemy and read the proposed solution in Discussion 408. Determine how custom filters could work without being associated with fields; done means the supported design and its expected behavior are defined and implemented.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

In graphene-sqlalchemy-filters. One of the benefits was that when adding custom filters, they didn't have to be associated to fields. It seems the new filter setup covers 90% of the use cases which is great! But, having custom filters unassociated to fields would be amazing. Are there any plans to support this?

I mention a potential solution in the discussion here
https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene-sqlalchemy/discussions/408

Dominant language
Python
Stars
985
Forks
224
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from graphql-python/graphene-sqlalchemy

All issues in graphql-python/graphene-sqlalchemy

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.