[workshop-sim] Improve: Inline billing-path choice and verification in Step 7d

Open Beginner friendly
  • Is something wrong?
#5,517 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 1 day

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Newbie friendliness
72/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
github, markdown
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Read 07d-confirm-model-access.md, 07-first-workflow, and side-quest-07d-billing-paths.md to understand the existing billing guidance and duplicated access check. Inline the billing decision and verification exercise in Step 7d, remove the duplicate from Step 7, then compare the affected step’s overall score and learning KPI index with the stated guardrails. The issue does not name a test or scoring command.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

feedback simulation workshop

Problem: 07-first-workflow has the highest dropout (21.8% of 22,478 at-risk runs); 3,793 of 4,901 failures are copilot-access-missing. 07d-confirm-model-access.md hands billing off to side-quest-07d-billing-paths.md and the access check appears twice (Step 7 and 7d).

Proposed change: Move the two-row billing decision table and a "which applies to me" question inline into 07d. Keep the side quest for detail. Add an exercise: after configuring, open the .lock.yml and find the line that proves the chosen path (copilot-requests permission or COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN). Remove the duplicated access check from Step 7.

Failure mode: access barrier

Quantitative guardrail: current overall_score 6.25; weakest dimension checkpoint_quality 0.0; active_learning 6.3, checkpoint_quality 0.0, scaffolding 5.0 (KPI index 3.67). Adding a verification exercise and a concrete checkpoint should raise active_learning and checkpoint_quality, with no change to cognitive demand.

Acceptance criteria:

  • The shared curriculum overall_score for the affected step stays flat or improves
  • The step's learning KPI index (2.0 × active_learning + 2.0 × checkpoint_quality + 1.5 × scaffolding) / 5.5 stays flat or improves
  • Hands-on practice, checkpoints, and scaffolding are preserved or strengthened

Suggested owner: copilot coding agent

Generated by 🔬 Workshop Student Simulator · copilot · auto · ~36 AIC · ⌖ ~1 AIC · ⊞ 15.4K · ◷

  • expires on Nov 10, 2026, 9:04 AM UTC
Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
58
Forks
40
Avg merge
1d 22h
Merged PRs (30d)
7

Getting set up

Open in Codespaces

Starts the project's dev container in your browser, under your own GitHub account.

  • No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
  • No pull request template
  • No contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from githubnext/gh-aw-workshop

All issues in githubnext/gh-aw-workshop

Similar issues

More JavaScript issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.