[workshop-sync] workshop/side-quest-11-05-event-triggers.md: wrong filename and mismatched Step 15/11c PR-reviewer references
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 88/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- markdown
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start with workshop/side-quest-11-05-event-triggers.md and compare its references against workshop/07-your-first-workflow.md, workshop/14b-pr-reviewer-workflow.md, and workshop/15-conditional-logic.md. Correct the filename, step references, comparison table, and closing link so each points to the described workflow. Done means all referenced files, step labels, triggers, and workflow descriptions match the workshop content.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Workshop file reviewed
workshop/side-quest-11-05-event-triggers.md
Problem
This file has several cross-reference and filename inaccuracies:
-
It references the Step 7 workflow file as
daily-status.md:You have an existing workflow file from Step 7 or Step 15, such as
.github/workflows/daily-status.md.But
workshop/07-your-first-workflow.md(Step 7) instructs learners to create.github/workflows/daily-report-status.md(compiling todaily-report-status.lock.yml), notdaily-status.md. -
It references a non-existent step:
This is a good fit when you want feedback tied to the current PR, like the PR Code Reviewer in Step 11c.
No step "11c" exists in this workshop — side quests under the "11" series are numbered
11-01through11-09(e.g.side-quest-11-04,side-quest-11-05). The actual PR reviewer workflow is built in14b-pr-reviewer-workflow.md. -
It mislabels Step 15 as a PR reviewer step:
The Daily Repo Status workflow in Step 7 and the PR Code Reviewer in Step 15 use the same workflow format...
| 15 PR Code Reviewer |pull_request: {}| You want feedback only when a PR changes |add-comment|
Return to the main adventure: Build — PR Code Reviewer.workshop/15-conditional-logic.mdis titled "Make Your Workflow Smarter with Conditional Logic" and adds a shell-based conditional check to the schedule-triggered daily-status workflow from Step 7 — it does not use apull_requesttrigger and is not a PR reviewer build step.
Current correct information
workshop/07-your-first-workflow.mdcreatesdaily-report-status.md/daily-report-status.lock.yml.workshop/14b-pr-reviewer-workflow.mdis the actual "Build a PR Reviewer" workflow step.workshop/15-conditional-logic.mdcovers conditional logic for the daily-status/report workflow, not PR review.
Suggested fix
- Replace
.github/workflows/daily-status.mdwith.github/workflows/daily-report-status.md. - Replace "PR Code Reviewer in Step 11c" with a correct reference to
14b-pr-reviewer-workflow.md. - Correct the "Step 7 vs Step 15" comparison section and table row so Step 15 is described accurately as conditional logic on the daily-status workflow (not a PR reviewer step with a
pull_requesttrigger), or swap in14b-pr-reviewer-workflow.mdas the actual PR reviewer comparison target. - Update the closing "Build — PR Code Reviewer" link/label to point to
14b-pr-reviewer-workflow.md, or relabel it to accurately describe15-conditional-logic.md.
[!WARNING]
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
githubnext.github.ioTo allow these domains, add them to the
network.allowedlist in your workflow frontmatter:network: allowed: - defaults - "githubnext.github.io"See Network Configuration for more information.
Generated by 🔍 Workshop Sync Check · copilot · auto · 145.7 AIC · ⌖ 5.5 AIC · ⊞ 8.2K · ◷
- expires on Sep 26, 2026, 4:57 AM UTC
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 49
- Forks
- 20
- Avg merge
- 7h 29m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 35
Getting set up
We have not checked this project's setup files yet. Start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from githubnext/gh-aw-workshop
-
feedback simulation workshop
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#3857 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
feedback simulation workshop
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#3856 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
curriculum documentation quality
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#3853 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
curriculum documentation quality
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#3851 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
curriculum documentation quality
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#3852 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
All issues in githubnext/gh-aw-workshop
Similar issues
-
factory-active factory-automatic task-bug-reproduction-success task-identify-harness-labels-done task-identify-issue-type-done
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
vercel/ai#21528 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
status: waiting triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp#70412 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch#490 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
Maintainers usually reply within 6 days