Protocol-gated tools (delete_repository) are listed based on the client's requested protocolVersion string, not the negotiated version
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 43/100
Research direction
Start with pkg/inventory/tool_availability.go at the reported checks around lines 120, 136, 148–151, and 175; then read the pinned SDK implementation in mcp/shared.go around lines 674–686. Trace how initialization negotiates the session protocol version and how tool availability handles unknown versions. Done means delete_repository is omitted when the negotiated version is below the minimum, unknown requested strings do not qualify as newer, and the stated elicitation and read-only conditions still hold.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Describe the bug
delete_repository is meant to be available only to sessions on protocol ≥ 2026-07-28 with form elicitation. The availability check reads req.ProtocolVersion(). For a session started with initialize, that returns the version the client requested (InitializeParams.ProtocolVersion), not the version the server answered. The comparison is also a plain string compare. As a result:
- A client that requests
2026-07-28is negotiated down to2025-11-25(deliberate in go-sdk, sinceinitializeis deprecated in 2026-07-28), yettools/listincludesdelete_repository. - Any string that sorts after
2026-07-28, such aszzz, does the same.
Impact is low. By code reading (not tested), --read-only should still remove the tool and deletion still requires the elicitation confirmation. But the listed tool set doesn't match the protocol the session actually speaks.
Upstream context: go-sdk issue modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk#1258 (closed 2026-11-03 by go-sdk PR #1266) fixed the same requested-vs-negotiated confusion inside the SDK, through an unexported ServerSession.protocolVersion(). The public ServerRequest.ProtocolVersion() on go-sdk main still returns InitializeParams.ProtocolVersion. That fix isn't in a go-sdk release yet (latest v1.8.0, which this repo pins), so a go-sdk bump alone will not change this server's behaviour.
Code (main 99d6d650, unchanged since v2.1.0): pkg/inventory/tool_availability.go:120,136,175 (req.ProtocolVersion()), :148-151 (protocolVersion >= minimum, string compare). go-sdk v1.8.0 mcp/shared.go:674-686 (ServerRequest.ProtocolVersion).
Affected version
v2.1.0 (image sha256:f6056fc1…0f8a, commit 4bcdcdf8) and main nightly (image sha256:48bc16d0…338f, revision 99d6d650). stdio, --toolsets=all.
Steps to reproduce the behavior
initialize:
The result has{"protocolVersion":"2026-07-28","capabilities":{"elicitation":{"form":{}}},"clientInfo":{"name":"t","version":"0"}}protocolVersion: "2025-11-25".tools/list: 92 tools, includingdelete_repository.- Same with
"protocolVersion":"zzz","capabilities":{"elicitation":{}}. Negotiated2025-11-25, 92 tools, includingdelete_repository. - Same with
"protocolVersion":"2025-11-25"and form elicitation: 91 tools, nodelete_repository. "2026-07-28"without an elicitation capability: 91 tools, nodelete_repository.
Expected vs actual behavior
Expected: availability follows the negotiated version (2025-11-25 in steps 1 and 2), so delete_repository is not listed. Unknown version strings are not treated as newer.
Actual: the requested string decides, and zzz counts as newer than 2026-07-28.
Suggested fix: gate on the negotiated version. Either have go-sdk expose it, or make ServerRequest.ProtocolVersion() return it (a follow-up to go-sdk #1266). Meanwhile, when there is no per-request _meta version, cap the session value to the initialize result's version. Compare against a list of known versions, not lexically.
Logs
requested 2026-07-28 + elicitation.form -> negotiated 2025-11-25, tools/list 92, delete_repository listed
requested zzz + elicitation -> negotiated 2025-11-25, tools/list 92, delete_repository listed
requested 2025-11-25 + elicitation.form -> negotiated 2025-11-25, tools/list 91
requested 2026-07-28, no elicitation -> negotiated 2025-11-25, tools/list 91
Same on v2.1.0 and main.
Found during an independent audit of v2.1.0 on a throwaway org and private test repo. Prepared with AI assistance (Claude Code); reproduced by two independent test runs before filing.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 34.2k
- Forks
- 5.3k
- Avg merge
- 5d 18h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 13
Getting set up
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/github-mcp-server
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 69/100
github/github-mcp-server#3760 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
github/github-mcp-server#3758 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 69/100
github/github-mcp-server#3729 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
github/github-mcp-server#3722 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Insiders Feedback: PR created UI doesn't link to the PRPossibly taken @genius-0963 claimed this 5 days ago. Openbug insiders user-experience
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
github/github-mcp-server#3658 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
All issues in github/github-mcp-server
Similar issues
-
ready-for-agent
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
hexlet-basics/hexlet-basics#962 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
imapproxy closeForMaintenance grace timer calls clientConn.Close() before closeMaintenanceTransportPossibly taken @dejanstrbac claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 83/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
renovate-health
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
Netcracker/qubership-network-latency-exporter#267 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Network capture does not workPossibly taken @KSpaceer claimed this today. Openkind/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
aquasecurity/tracee#5395 ·