Add merge queue support to pull request tools (enqueue, dequeue, queue status)
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 52/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- go, graphql
- Domain
- api, backend-api-design
Research direction
Start by reading the existing pull request tool definitions and their GraphQL request patterns, then check how pull_request_read exposes PR data. Implement the two queue mutations and the status read using the fields listed in the issue. Done means all three operations return the specified queue data, including a clean null when no queue exists; the issue does not name specific files or tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Describe the feature or problem you'd like to solve
There is no way to interact with a branch's merge queue through the MCP server.
merge_pull_request calls the REST merge endpoint. On a base branch protected by a merge queue ruleset, GitHub rejects that call: the only supported path is to enqueue the pull request and let the queue merge it. Today an MCP client has to fall back to gh pr merge --auto or raw GraphQL for that step, which breaks the MCP-first workflow.
This request is intentionally separate from auto-merge (#2411). Auto-merge is a per-PR flag that merges once requirements pass. A merge queue is a branch-level mechanism with its own queue entries, ordering, and state. They use different GraphQL mutations and should be modelled as different tools, even though a client may use both.
Proposed solution
Add merge queue support to the pull_requests toolset:
-
enqueue_pull_request(write), wrappingenqueuePullRequestowner,repo,pullNumber(required)jump(optional, boolean): place the entry at the front of the queueexpectedHeadSha(optional): maps toexpectedHeadOid, mirrors the existingmerge_pull_requestsafety parameter- Returns the created merge queue entry: position, state, enqueued time, and the
solo/jumpflags
-
dequeue_pull_request(write), wrappingdequeuePullRequestowner,repo,pullNumber(required)- Returns the removed entry
-
get_merge_queue_statusmethod onpull_request_read(read), exposing the PR'smergeQueueEntry- Returns whether the PR is queued, its position, state (
QUEUED,AWAITING_CHECKS,LOCKED,MERGEABLE,UNMERGEABLE), and the estimated time to merge if available - Returns
nullcleanly when the base branch has no merge queue, so clients can decide betweenmerge_pull_requestandenqueue_pull_request
- Returns whether the PR is queued, its position, state (
Benefits: agents can complete the full PR lifecycle on repositories that require a merge queue without leaving MCP, and can report queue progress back to the user.
Example prompts or workflows (for tools/toolsets only)
- "Add PR #XXX to the merge queue once it is approved."
- "Is PR #XXX in the merge queue? What position is it in and is anything blocking it?"
- "Remove PR #XXX from the merge queue, I need to push a fix first."
- "For every approved PR of mine in this repo, enqueue it if the base branch uses a merge queue, otherwise merge it directly."
- "This hotfix is urgent, enqueue it at the front of the queue."
Additional context
- The two mutations are the same ones used by the
ghCLI and the web UI, so the semantics are already familiar to users. merge_pull_requestcould additionally return a clearer error when the base branch requires a merge queue, pointing the client toenqueue_pull_request. That is a nice-to-have on top of the three items above.- Merge queue state is currently readable only indirectly, via the
merge_queuerule in governance ruleset output. That tells a client the queue exists, but not whether a given PR is in it.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 34.2k
- Forks
- 5.3k
- Avg merge
- 5d 18h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 13
Getting set up
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/github-mcp-server
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 69/100
github/github-mcp-server#3760 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
github/github-mcp-server#3758 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 69/100
github/github-mcp-server#3729 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
github/github-mcp-server#3722 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Insiders Feedback: PR created UI doesn't link to the PRPossibly taken @genius-0963 claimed this 5 days ago. Openbug insiders user-experience
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
github/github-mcp-server#3658 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
All issues in github/github-mcp-server
Similar issues
-
ready-for-agent
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
hexlet-basics/hexlet-basics#962 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
imapproxy closeForMaintenance grace timer calls clientConn.Close() before closeMaintenanceTransportPossibly taken @dejanstrbac claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 83/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
renovate-health
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
Netcracker/qubership-network-latency-exporter#267 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Network capture does not workPossibly taken @KSpaceer claimed this today. Openkind/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
aquasecurity/tracee#5395 ·