`gh stack` resolves the API repository from the `origin` remote, ignoring `--remote`, `gh repo set-default`, and its own state file — silently operating on the wrong repository in multi-remote clones
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 52/100
Research direction
Start by tracing repository resolution from the gh stack init and gh stack submit entry points, including --remote, GH_REPO, gh-resolved, and the repository field in .git/gh-stack. Compare the selected repository with the push remote and verify that interactive and --auto flows either target the intended repository or fail explicitly when resolution is ambiguous.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
In a clone with multiple remotes, every gh stack PR/stack API operation is bound to the repository of the origin remote, regardless of:
- the
--remoteflag (which only changes the push target), gh repo set-default/remote.<name>.gh-resolved(the standard gh CLI repo resolution),- the
repositoryfield in.git/gh-stack(editing it has no effect on subsequent runs).
If origin points at a different repository than the one your branches and PRs live in — the completely standard fork workflow where origin is upstream and you push to your fork — gh stack submit pushes to the right remote but then tries to create PRs and stacks on the wrong repository. In --auto / non-interactive mode this happens silently: there is no "Multiple remotes found" prompt (the interactive path in #219 at least shows one).
In my case the only reason no PRs were actually opened against the upstream project is that my branches don't exist there, so every createPullRequest failed. If upstream had happened to contain same-named branches, gh stack submit --auto would have opened a pile of PRs against a repository I never pointed it at. For agent/scripted use this is a dangerous default.
Environment
- gh version 2.96.0
- gh-stack v0.1.0
- Clone with 7 remotes;
origin=github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows(upstream),joibel=github.com/Joibel/argo-workflows(fork, where all stack branches and 8 open PRs live) gh repo set-default Joibel/argo-workflowsis set (remote.joibel.gh-resolved = base)
Steps to reproduce
- Clone a repo with
originpointing at upstream and a second remote pointing at your fork. - Create branches with open PRs on the fork (head and base both on the fork).
gh stack init --base <trunk> <branch1> ... <branchN>— adopts the branches fine, but records"repository": "github.com:<origin-owner>/<repo>"in.git/gh-stack.gh stack submit --remote <fork-remote> --auto
Observed
-
Push goes to the fork remote correctly ("Pushing to joibel... ✓ Pushed and synced 8 branches").
-
All PR operations target the
originrepository: existing fork PRs are not detected, and the extension attemptscreatePullRequestagainst upstream, failing with:⚠ failed to create PR for <branch>: creating PR: GraphQL: Head sha can't be blank, Base sha can't be blank, No commits between <base> and <branch>, Head ref must be a branch, Base ref must be a branch (createPullRequest)(Same error signature as #219, different root cause — here the refs genuinely don't exist because it's querying the wrong repository.)
-
The interactive TUI confirms it: the header shows
Repo: argoproj/argo-workflowseven when invoked with--remote joibel. -
None of the following change the target repository:
--remote,gh repo set-default, editing therepositoryfield in.git/gh-stack.
Workaround
GH_REPO=<fork-owner>/<repo> gh stack submit --remote <fork-remote> --auto works perfectly — existing PRs are detected ("PR #NN for is up to date") and the stack is created.
Expected
- Repo resolution should follow the standard gh CLI rules (
GH_REPO, thengh-resolved/gh repo set-default, then remote heuristics), or at minimum follow the remote selected with--remote, since a stack's branches and PRs must by definition (#46) live in the repository the branches are pushed to. - If resolution is ambiguous in non-interactive mode, fail with an explicit "multiple remotes, specify GH_REPO or --remote" error rather than silently picking
origin. gh stack initshould surface/validate which repository it bound the stack to.
Related
- #219 — same GraphQL error signature via a different resolution failure; its interactive run at least got a "Multiple remotes found" prompt, which
--autoskips. - #45, #337 — same code area (deriving the API repo from remote URLs) tripping on SSH aliases / hostname remaps.
- #46 — cross-fork stacks; confirms head+base must be one repository, which makes binding to
origindoubly wrong when pushes go elsewhere.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 1.5k
- Forks
- 73
- Avg merge
- 1d 8h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/gh-stack
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
-
feature request topic: cli - general
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
feature request topic: auto-merge
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
bug topic: docs
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 68/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
NVIDIA/gpu-operator#2955 ·
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
kovidgoyal/kitty#10516 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
cisagov/vulnrichment#337 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100