Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

[deep-report] Daily Max Ai Credits Test failures aren't flagged intentional_failure, skewing success-rate rollups

Closed Beginner friendly
  • Is something wrong?
#66,401 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 1 day

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Newbie friendliness
65/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
github-actions, go
Domain
tooling

Research direction

The issue does not name the classification files or tests. Start by locating where the logs tooling derives or tags intentional_failure, then compare the handling of “Daily Max Ai Credits Test” with its sibling “Daily Credit Limit Test.” Confirm the expected-failure runs are tagged correctly and run the relevant tests; done means the expected failures are excluded from success-rate rollups.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

automation code-quality cookie improvement observability quick-win task-mining tooling
Description

This week's fleet-log sample shows "Daily Max Ai Credits Test" had 7 runs with 3 failures, all driver_exit-type consistent with its per-run max-ai-credits guardrail firing as designed — but none of the 3 failed runs were flagged intentional_failure: true in the logs tool's metadata, unlike its sibling "Daily Credit Limit Test" (14/14 flagged correctly). This means fleet-wide success-rate rollups that exclude intentional_failure runs currently miss this workflow and undercount its expected failures as real regressions.

Expected Impact

Keeps weekly/fleet success-rate reporting accurate by correctly classifying this guardrail test's expected failures, preventing a recurring false signal in health reports.

Suggested Agent

General Go agent working on the agenticworkflows/logs-classification tooling (wherever intentional_failure is derived/tagged)

Estimated Effort

Quick (< 1 hour — likely a missing name/pattern match in the classification logic)

Data Source

DeepReport fleet-health log analysis, 2026-09-30 to 2026-10-07 (agenticworkflows logs sampling)

Generated by 🔬 Deep Report · claude · agent · 553.8 AIC · ⌖ 7.81 AIC · ⊞ 7.1K · ◷

  • expires on Oct 8, 2026, 5:41 PM UTC-08:00
Dominant language
Go
Stars
5.4k
Forks
576
Avg merge
8h 12m
Merged PRs (30d)
800

Getting set up

Open in Codespaces

Starts the project's dev container in your browser, under your own GitHub account.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from github/gh-aw

All issues in github/gh-aw

Similar issues

More Go issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.