[aw] Pelis Agent Factory Advisor: hit engine rate limit (HTTP 429)
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- github, github-actions, typescript
- Domain
- ai-infra-agents, ci-cd, devops
Research direction
Start with the linked workflow source, .github/workflows/pelis-agent-factory-advisor.md, and inspect the failed run for invocation-cap and retry details. The issue points to prompt exhaustion but gives no specific change to make, so identify why the workflow exceeds its invocation budget before proposing a fix. Done means a run completes and records terminal safe output without exceeding the invocation cap.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
What happened
Pelis Agent Factory Advisor hit engine rate limit (HTTP 429).
View run #39171698818 · Workflow source · Previous failures
Branch: main
Next step
Review the failure details below for a targeted fix, or assign this issue to a coding agent to investigate.
Failure details
Runtime evidence
[!WARNING]
Task Could Not Be Completed: The workflow recorded areport_incompletesignal: the task was not completed or completion could not be confirmed.
Error details:
Failure classification: prompt_exhaustion
Driver exit code: 1. The engine driver exited before a terminal safe output was recorded.
Last tool call status: succeeded
Last tool exit code: 0
Failed tool calls observed: 1
Token budget state: unknown (no exhaustion signal recorded)
Step budget state (LLM invocations): exceeded
Safe-output tools: available at gateway snapshot (registered 5 tools)
Safe-output CLI calls observed: unknown (not recorded)
Safe-output MCP calls observed: 0
Safe-output persistence: not recorded
Engine error: Maximum LLM invocations exceeded (invocation_cap_exceeded)
Agent finished without emitting a terminal safe output; task completion could not be confirmed.
Engine HTTP error codes: 429
Last engine error type: invocation_cap_exceeded
Retry attempts observed: 2
A comment or other safe output does not confirm that the requested task was completed. Only inferred runtime status and error codes are reported; agent text is excluded.
Failure Diagnostics
Agent job: agent
Agent job conclusion: failure
Failing step: Execute GitHub Copilot CLI
No additional engine error was captured. Check the reported failure signals and linked run for details.
Only runtime metadata is shown; agent-generated text is excluded.
Copy a debugging prompt
Paste this into your coding agent:
Debug the agentic workflow "pelis-agent-factory-advisor" failure.
Follow https://raw.githubusercontent.com/github/gh-aw/main/debug.md
Failed run: https://github.com/github/gh-aw-firewall/actions/runs/39171698818
If the repository includes the agentic-workflows skill, load it before investigating.
Manage failure notifications
To stop creating failure issues for this workflow, set this in its frontmatter and recompile:
safe-outputs:
report-failure-as-issue: false
This only disables issue reporting; it does not fix the failure.
Generated from Pelis Agent Factory Advisor · copilot · haiku45 · 6.56 AIC · ◷
- expires on Oct 25, 2026, 10:30 PM UTC
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 149
- Forks
- 77
- Avg merge
- 4h 34m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 418
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/gh-aw-firewall
-
agentic-workflows automated dependencies
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#3837 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Specify filesystem sharing, component identities, and permissions with implementation drift checksPossibly taken @lpcox claimed this today. Open
github/gh-aw-firewall#10225 · 1 reaction · 2 assignees ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 25/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#10215 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#10214 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 4/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#10213 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in github/gh-aw-firewall
Similar issues
-
[测试] 等待仓库加载后再记录多仓库排序基线Possibly taken @myot233 claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area:arcade p3-medium ready-for-agent testing type:docs
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
fderuiter/deruiter.dev#2369 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area:devenv origin:agent type:bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
overengineeringstudio/effect-utils#1949 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
ccch1mneyyy/dsh-TUI#1631 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
MiniMax-AI/minimax-code#507 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day