Consider testing CodeQL also against Kotlin EA versions
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- github-actions, kotlin
- Domain
- ci-cd, testing-qa
Research direction
Start by reviewing the reported CodeQL issues and the Kotlin early-access version documentation, then inspect the repository's existing GitHub Actions workflows for Kotlin version testing. Determine whether a matrix can test current CodeQL against Kotlin EAP releases and define how failures should surface. Done means the approach is documented or implemented with maintainable coverage for EAP versions.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Description of the issue
For some time now, all projects using Kotlin and CodeQL face the following situation:
- A new Kotlin version is released
- Dependabot, Renovate, or equivalent creates a PR to upgrade Kotlin
- The PR fails as CodeQL doesn't support the new version yet
- After some weeks, a CodeQL release is out for that version, but a new Kotlin version is also released briefly after, which basically restarts the process from step 1
The reported cases since last October:
- https://github.com/github/codeql/issues/22189
- https://github.com/github/codeql/issues/22210
- https://github.com/github/codeql/issues/21938
- https://github.com/github/codeql/issues/21484
- https://github.com/github/codeql/issues/21345
- https://github.com/github/codeql/issues/20661
Just by looking at the timeline of some of these issues, it should be visible how many public projects keep the Kotlin upgrade on hold due to the CodeQL compatibility.
Would you consider testing the current CodeQL version against the Kotlin early-access versions?
I understand testing against EA versions won't necessarily mean anticipating the necessary changes, but I wonder if something relatively cheap could be achieved with a GitHub Actions matrix to at least bring awareness to the process.
- Dominant language
- CodeQL
- Stars
- 10.1k
- Forks
- 2.1k
- Avg merge
- 2d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 134
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/codeql
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
C#: cs/simplifiable-boolean-expression false positive on Nullable<bool> compared with a literal Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
false-positive
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
false-positive
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
NVIDIA/gpu-operator#2955 ·
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
automated issue report
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
dsx-ai-factory/infra-controller#6694 ·
-
bug build
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
facebookincubator/velox#19143 ·