[GHSA-rp9m-7r4c-75qg] [CVE-2026-35039] - Request for CVSS correction or clarification
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Domain
- security
Research direction
Review GHSA-rp9m-7r4c-75qg and CVE-2026-35039 alongside the linked CVSS 3.1 guidance and the reporter's proposed vector. Verify whether possession of a valid JWT changes PR and whether the stated impact is justified; done means documenting the decision and updating the advisory metadata if warranted.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Hi GitHub,
Our automated CVSS enrichment pipeline detected some discrepancies between GitHub's provided vector and ours. Since this also passed a GitHub review, I thought it would be helpful to share my insights here, so that the vector or its justification might be corrected. For reference, this was the output from our AI pipeline: https://graph.volerion.com/view?id=CVE-2026-35039.
For the current vector, PR:N was set, but exploitation requires an attacker to possess a valid JWT, which is an authentication artifact, and therefore constitutes at least a low privilege requirement.
Additionally, impact could have been downgraded to C:L/I:L due to the fact it may not be reasonable to believe that an attacker could obtain administrator-like control in most implementations involving this library. However, since that is also arguably the most subjective part of the CVSS specification, I won't press that point if you feel otherwise.
My suggestion would be to change PR:N to PR:L which comes down to a final vector of:
https://volerion.com/cvss/3.1#vector=CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Thanks!
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 2.5k
- Forks
- 772
- Avg merge
- 3d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 46
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/advisory-database
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/advisory-database#9255 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#9164 · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#8994 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/advisory-database#8898 · 4 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#8841 ·
All issues in github/advisory-database
Similar issues
-
needs-triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Nmap
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability untriaged
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
blocklist removal
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect#296544 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
Azure/azure-functions-docker#1257 ·