[GHSA-cj4v-437j-jq4c] [CVE-2026-25921] - Request for CVSS correction or clarification
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Domain
- security
Research direction
Review the advisory's current CVSS vector against the proposed CVSS:3.1 vector and the linked FIRST CVSS v3.1 user guide. Verify the Scope, Complexity, User Interaction, and Availability rationale, then document or apply the corrected score if the analysis is supported.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Hi GitHub,
Our automated CVSS enrichment pipeline detected some discrepancies between GitHub's provided vector and ours. Since this also passed a GitHub review, I thought it would be helpful to share my insights here, so that the vector or its justification might be corrected. For reference, this was the output from our AI pipeline: https://graph.volerion.com/view?id=CVE-2026-25921.
For the current vector, Scope is Changed (S:C), due to the stated supply-chain attack vector, but I believe this to be secondary impact that an attacker cannot expect to achieve for all or most instances of an attack against this product. Otherwise, including that 'appendage' would increase attack complexity via either AC (an automated system must later pull and utilize the poisoned source) or UI (a user does the same).
Additionally, A:L may have been set due to a common misconception regarding Availability impact. The vulnerable system is still fully available, albeit serving different content than intended, and therefore directly suffers a serious loss of integrity only.
The final vector would then be:
https://volerion.com/cvss/3.1#vector=CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
With a changed base score from 9.3 to 7.5.
Thanks!
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 2.5k
- Forks
- 772
- Avg merge
- 3d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 46
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/advisory-database
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/advisory-database#9255 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#9164 · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#8994 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/advisory-database#8898 · 4 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#8841 ·
All issues in github/advisory-database
Similar issues
-
needs-triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Nmap
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability untriaged
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
blocklist removal
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect#296544 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
Azure/azure-functions-docker#1257 ·