Consider loosening restrictions of `Final`

Aucun fichier ni test n’est nommé. Commencez par examiner les règles actuelles de Final et les passages de PEP cités dans l’issue, puis lisez le fil de commentaires pour prendre connaissance des objections précédentes. Le travail est terminé lorsqu’une décision claire a été prise concernant les affectations séparées, les déclarations de boucles et les annotations des arguments de fonction, et que le comportement accepté a été consigné dans la spécification typing concernée.

I think that Final is a very based idea, but I feel that it's current restrictions make using it painful.

I think that split assignments should be allowed:

def foo(cond: bool) -> None:
    if cond:
        a: Final = Funny("spam")
    else:
        a: Final = Funny("eggs")  # this is currently an error

Most languages allow this pattern to initialize constant variables:

def foo(cond: bool) -> None:
    a: Final[Funny]
    if cond:
        a = Funny("spam")
    else:
        a = Funny("eggs")

I think these are convenient and enables Final to be used in more scenarios, but this is currently an error.
But this is allowed:

def foo(cond: bool) -> None:
    a: Final = Funny("spam") if cond else Funny("eggs")

Another issue I've found is the prohibition of Final declarations within loops:

def foo() -> None:
    for i in [1,2,3]:
        a: Final = i * 2  # currently an error
        a = 10  # error
        print(a)
    print(a)
    a = 10  # error

This is defined in the pep:

Note that a type checker need not allow Final declarations inside loops since the runtime will see multiple assignments to the same variable in subsequent iterations.

I understand that at runtime the same variable is reused for each iteration of the loop, but if you ignore that fact and just look at the semantic meaning of the code, it matches exactly to this Kotlin example:

fun foo() {
    val a = listOf(1, 2, 3).map { i ->
        val a = i
        a = 10  // error
        println(a)
        a
    }.last()
    println(a)
    a = 10  // error
}

Disallowing Final in loops doesn't address any of the motivations listed in the pep, any I can't see any reason why it should be disallowed.

Also, why are Final annotations not allowed on functional arguments?

Final may only be used as the outermost type in assignments or variable annotations. Using it in any other position is an error. In particular, Final can't be used in annotations for function arguments:

Why? This is commonly seen in other languages. In Kotlin, function parameters can only be val(Kotlin's form of Final), in Java a function parameter may be marked with final.