Hacktoberfest 2026 : les issues que les mainteneurs ont marquées pour octobre, ouvertes et accessibles aux débutants. Parcourir les issues Hacktoberfest

Unhandled error in sys.excepthook

Ouverte
#30 1 commentaire 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
4/5
Temps estimé
3-5 jours
Accessibilité débutants
35/100
Type d'issue
Bug
Clarté
Plutôt claire
Activité
À l'abandon
Stack technique
python

Piste de recherche

Commencez par reproduire la séquence d’arrêt avec la sortie de débogage de execnet, en vous concentrant sur gateway.exit(), la finalisation du thread récepteur et le nettoyage atexit présenté dans le rapport. Comparez les erreurs obtenues avec le comportement d’arrêt de threading de Python et le correctif threading.py lié. La tâche est terminée lorsque le nettoyage lors de l’arrêt de l’interpréteur n’émet plus les erreurs de thread non gérées et de sys.excepthook.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

After closing the connections we are seeing a few thread errors that seem impossible to get rid of. At the point where they are sent to stderr there is nothing left running and the code has closed the gateway.

Unhandled exception in thread started by
Error in sys.excepthook:

Original exception was:

Running execnet with debug show this:

[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] RECEIVERTHREAD: starting to run
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_EXEC channelid=1 len=6354>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'platform_information()'>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 ('Ubuntu', '12.04', 'precise')>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'machine_type()'>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'x86_64'>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'shortname()'>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'node1'>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 len=324>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 None>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 len=127>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 None>
[53488] gw0 gateway.exit() called
[53488] gw0 --> sending GATEWAY_TERMINATE
[53488] gw0 --> io.close_write
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] EOF without prior gateway termination message
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] entering finalization
[53488] gw0 finished receiving
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] terminating execution
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] closing read
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] closing write
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] leaving finalization
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] RECEIVERTHREAD: starting to run
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_EXEC channelid=1 len=6354>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'platform_information()'>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 ('CentOS', '6.4', 'Final')>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'machine_type()'>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'x86_64'>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'shortname()'>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'node2'>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 len=324>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 None>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 len=127>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 None>
[53488] gw1 gateway.exit() called
[53488] gw1 --> sending GATEWAY_TERMINATE
[53488] gw1 --> io.close_write
[53488] === atexit cleanup <Group []> ===
[53488] gw0 1 channel.__del__
[53488] gw1 1 channel.__del__
Unhandled exception in thread started by
Error in sys.excepthook:

Original exception was:

It looks as though this is happening in the threading module in Python itself. I am not sure something is possible to eat up these messages.

There is a ticket open in the Python bug tracker that mentions this problem is closed:

http://bugs.python.org/issue1722344

One of the patches that one commenter added looks like what we would need to get rid of them (http://bugs.python.org/file9356/1722344_squelch_exception.patch)

--- /usr/lib/python2.5/threading.py.orig	2008-02-04 13:58:18.000000000 -0600
+++ ./threading.py	2008-02-05 11:55:33.000000000 -0600
@@ -472,34 +472,18 @@
                     _sys.stderr.write("Exception in thread %s:\n%s\n" %
                                       (self.getName(), _format_exc()))
                 else:
-                    # Do the best job possible w/o a huge amt. of code to
-                    # approximate a traceback (code ideas from
-                    # Lib/traceback.py)
-                    exc_type, exc_value, exc_tb = self.__exc_info()
-                    try:
-                        print>>self.__stderr, (
-                            "Exception in thread " + self.getName() +
-                            " (most likely raised during interpreter shutdown):")
-                        print>>self.__stderr, (
-                            "Traceback (most recent call last):")
-                        while exc_tb:
-                            print>>self.__stderr, (
-                                '  File "%s", line %s, in %s' %
-                                (exc_tb.tb_frame.f_code.co_filename,
-                                    exc_tb.tb_lineno,
-                                    exc_tb.tb_frame.f_code.co_name))
-                            exc_tb = exc_tb.tb_next
-                        print>>self.__stderr, ("%s: %s" % (exc_type, exc_value))
-                    # Make sure that exc_tb gets deleted since it is a memory
-                    # hog; deleting everything else is just for thoroughness
-                    finally:
-                        del exc_type, exc_value, exc_tb
+                    # If _sys is missing, then the interpreter is shutting
+                    # down and the thread should no longer exist.  If this
+                    # happens, ignore the error and exit gracefully.
+                    pass
             else:
                 if __debug__:
                     self._note("%s.__bootstrap(): normal return", self)
         finally:
-            self.__stop()
+            # Exceptions will also be raised during stop/delete if the
+            # interpreter is shutting down.  Ignore these as well.
             try:
+                self.__stop()
                 self.__delete()
             except:
                 pass
Langage dominant
Python
Étoiles
102
Forks
47
Métriques de merge des PR
Aucune PR mergée en 30 j

Préparer son environnement

Nous n'avons pas encore vérifié les fichiers d'installation de ce projet. Commencez par son README, et consultez notre guide de la première contribution pour les étapes générales.

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de pytest-dev/execnet

Toutes les issues de pytest-dev/execnet

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues Python

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.