Improve documentation for Control.Monad.State
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 2/5
- Temps estimé
- 1-3 heures
- Accessibilité débutants
- 52/100
- Type d'issue
- Documentation
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Domaine
- documentation
Piste de recherche
Find the documentation for State in Control.Monad.State and compare it with the MonadState documentation in Control.Monad.State.Class. Add an explanation of what State means beyond its type alias, including its relationship to MonadState. Done when readers can understand that relationship from the State documentation; the issue names no specific files or tests.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
The documentation for State in Control.Monad.State gives State's type definition as as type StateT s Identity, and says that "The State monad is a synonym for the StateT monad transformer, applied to the Identity monad."
That documentation simply repeats whats' in the type signature, but I have to assume that I'm not alone in finding the type signature opaque. Understanding it requires studying StateT and Identity, and then figuring out what the implications of their combination are.
There's information that seems relevant in the documentation for MonadState in Control.Monad.State.Class, but it's not easy to figure out what the relationship is between MonadState and StateT s Identity. It doesn't seem as if one is normally supposed to use MonadState directly, in any event.
Purescript by Example has some discussion of the State monad. It's helpful, but it's fairly superficial and didn't answer my questions. I didn't find anything helpful for my needs in Jordan's Reference, though it's possible that I haven't looked in the right place. Instead I've been studying Haskell resources to learn about Haskell's Control.Monad.State, which is obviously the model for Purescript's State. However, then one has to worry about possible differences in corner cases or even more substantial semantical features. This becomes a real issue when I translate Haskell code into Purescript and get an error that isn't due to obvious differences between the languages. (e.g. it's obvioius using (x, y) instead of Tuple x y is a mistake). Then it's not clear whether I made a mistake, or whether there's difference in the semantics of the two State monads. Since it's hard to understand the documentation for Purescript's State, figuring out whether there's a difference isn't easy. (The documentation for Haskell's State is confusing, too, but the docs are more detailed, and there are lots of other things one can read about Haskell's State.)
Normally, I'd expect that more explanation of something like the State monad might be found in the package documentation. However, since the Control.Monad.* modules are part of the transformers package, and there are lots of other modules in that package, I can understand why the package documentation doesn't say anything about particular modules or groups of modules.
However, I think there needs to be documentation of State that goes beyond it's type alias definition. One small thing that might help would be a brief explanation within the documentation for State of its relationship to MonadState.
Thanks!
- Langage dominant
- PureScript
- Étoiles
- 72
- Forks
- 43
- Merge moyen
- 2 j 23 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 1
Préparer son environnement
- Aucun Dockerfile ni fichier Docker Compose
- Propose un modèle de pull request
- Aucun guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de purescript/purescript-transformers
-
MonadAsk is over constrainedOuvertetype: breaking change
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 35/100
purescript/purescript-transformers#144 · 2 commentaires ·
-
type: documentation
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 28/100
purescript/purescript-transformers#129 · 6 commentaires ·
-
type: enhancement
Difficulté 5/5 Plus d'une semaine Accessibilité débutants 18/100
purescript/purescript-transformers#123 · 4 commentaires ·
-
maybeToExceptTOuvertetype: enhancement
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 42/100
-
type: documentation
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 30/100
purescript/purescript-transformers#117 · 6 commentaires ·
Toutes les issues de purescript/purescript-transformers
Issues similaires
-
bug
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 75/100
MetrolistGroup/Metrolist#4554 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
bug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 82/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 72/100
kubescape/node-agent#1099 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
15.0
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 62/100
-
[workshop-sim] Improve: Provide a concrete example and activity checks in agentic intro (step 5)Ouvertefeedback simulation workshop
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 68/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5715 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour