Investigate CWE-369, Divide by Zero
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Accessibilité débutants
- 25/100
Piste de recherche
Read the CWE-369 guidance and review the proposed Python example against the discussion linked in the issue. Decide which compliant solutions should be documented and clarify how integer division, Decimal overflow, and the ctypes case apply. Done means the guide presents accurate, agreed examples and explains when each approach is appropriate.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
When trying to demonstrate a compliant solution for CWE-369, we ran into a lot of questions on how to handle this.
When performing division or remainder calculations on integers in Python, a ZeroDivisionError can occur if the divisor is zero. To prevent this, the divisor should be checked to ensure it is not zero before proceeding, or handle the ZeroDivisionError exception if the divisor is zero. This rule only applies to integers, not floating-point numbers. In floating-point arithmetic, dividing a positive non-zero value by zero yields positive infinity, while dividing a negative non-zero value by zero produces negative infinity. However, attempting to divide zero by zero leads to a ZeroDivisionError, as the outcome is undefined.
'Decimal' is used in division calculations, as it ensures the accuracy of the math, and it also prevents float overflow from occurring.
Emax and Emin are the upper and lower bounds of the Decimal class. Overflow can occur in decimal calculation if the calculated number is above or below the Emax or Emin. The default precision of decimal numbers is 28. So all integers up to 999999999999999999999999999999 (28 nines) can be represented exactly, and higher numbers might be rounded.
We have this potentially compliant code example:
Which tries to include error handling for division by zero and potential overflow errors:
""" Compliant Code Example """
from decimal import Decimal, ROUND_HALF_UP, Overflow
def divide(first_number: int, second_number: int):
'''Function to divide 2 numbers'''
if second_number == 0:
raise ZeroDivisionError("TODO: implement zero division error handling here")
# This operation may cause an overflow due to a large exponent
try:
result = Decimal(first_number / second_number)
except Overflow as e:
raise Overflow("TODO: implement overflow error handling here") from e
rounded_result = Decimal(result).quantize(Decimal("0.01"), rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP)
# Rounding result to 2 decimal place
return rounded_result
#####################
# Trying to exploit above code example
#####################
for number in (10, 41, 200, -10, 0):
# Dividing 100 by each number 10, 41, 200, -10, and 0 separately.
print("-" * 20 + f"divide by {number}" + "-" * 20 + "\n")
print(f"100 / {number} = ", end="")
print(divide(100, number))
However, after more thought and discussion with the python community on this issue, perhaps since dividing two integers already raises ZeroDivisionError. You don’t need to check if the divisor is zero and raise ZeroDivisionError because it happens automatically.
Hence the only risk may come from using ctypes... in which case the following compliant solutions a possibilities:
Maybe there could just be numerous examples of compliant solutions:
- running the code in a safe environment that raises a divide by zero exception, and handles exceptions gracefully.
- user input checking.
- a Maybe Monad.
- return float('nan') (or requiring zeros to be signed and returning + or - float('inf') accordingly)
- intrinsically non-zero denominators, e.g. len(...) + 1.
- converting the numerator and denominator to a class T on which T(1)/T(0) is valid, (e.g. the Projectively Extended Real Line).
Full discussion with python.org can be seen here:
https://discuss.python.org/t/is-this-a-compliant-solution-for-cwe-369/86953/8
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 2
- Forks
- 2
- Merge moyen
- 11 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 2
Préparer son environnement
- Aucun Dockerfile ni fichier Docker Compose
- Aucun modèle de pull request
- Lire le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de ossf/python-secure-coding-guide
-
pyscg-0051 should use a context managerPeut-être pris @s19110 l’a pris il y a 8 jours. Ouvertebug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 68/100
ossf/python-secure-coding-guide#1 · 4 commentaires · 1 personne assignée ·
-
Difficulté 3/5 1-2 jours Accessibilité débutants 65/100
ossf/python-secure-coding-guide#29 · 1 commentaire ·
-
Difficulté 5/5 Plus d'une semaine Accessibilité débutants 25/100
-
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 25/100
-
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 25/100
Toutes les issues de ossf/python-secure-coding-guide
Issues similaires
-
README Quick Start query command fails, and doctor points to a missing Prerequisites sectionOuvertedocumentation type/bug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
add entry to blockOuverte
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 65/100
StevenBlack/hosts#3299 ·
-
`garak --report` overwrites the input report when its name has no ".report"Peut-être pris @0z5a l’a pris aujourd’hui. Ouverteneeds-triage
Difficulté 2/5 Une demi-journée Accessibilité débutants 72/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 2 jours
-
trace: Pi's 1-hour cache writes are priced at 1.25x, but billed at 2xPeut-être pris @Shizoqua l’a pris aujourd’hui. Ouverte
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 82/100
microsoft/TokenEconomizer#221 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
plot_graph crashes when a mesh node has no m2m edgePeut-être pris @tygvi l’a pris aujourd’hui. Ouverte
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
mllam/neural-lam#883 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 2 jours