pySCG: Python Hardening Guide: we should mention and explain audit hooks, sys.audit and sys.addaudithook

Ouverte
#18 4 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
3/5
Temps estimé
1-2 jours
Accessibilité débutants
45/100
Type d'issue
Documentation
Clarté
Plutôt claire
Activité
À l'abandon
Stack technique
python

Piste de recherche

Read the logging rules in the CWE-532 guideline linked from the issue and review PEP 578 alongside the example01.py example in the issue. Decide whether audit hooks should be explained in a log related rule and whether they help separate internal and user facing logs; done means the relevant guidance clearly explains the recommendation and its limits.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

sys.audit allows to create events that can be used during audits as demonstrated in example01.py
aduprocess.py Popen class has a line that creates an audit event looking like this:
sys.audit("subprocess.Popen", executable, args, cwd, env)

These type of events are Python internal and not handled unless there is a listener/hook.
The example01.py creates the audit method that is attached/hooked into the Python audit system via sys.addaudtihook(audit).
The audit method allows any sort of handling of an event including suppressing functions.

example01.py:

"""
Playing around with audit hooks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIibadhDqaw
https://github.com/ossf/wg-best-practices-os-developers/issues
"""
import sys
from typing import Any
import subprocess


def audit(event: str, args: tuple[Any, ...]) -> None:
    """ foo """
    # if "subprocess" in event:
    print("audit::", event, args)


sys.addaudithook(audit)

# compile(None, '<stdin>')
# print('hi')
subprocess.Popen(('echo', 'hi'))
import email

In our rules about logging we recommend to prevent sensitive information such as system internals to end-users. We recommend to split logging between internal and user facing. The use facing has sensitive system-internal information removed. Audit logs should be mentioned as part of one of the log related rules. We will need to investigate if the use of audit logs can be recommended to solve the issue around splitting back-ed, front-end.

related guideline:
PEP 578 – Python Runtime Audit Hooks
CWE-532: Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File

Langage dominant
Python
Étoiles
2
Forks
2
Merge moyen
11 min
PR mergées (30 j)
2

Préparer son environnement

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de ossf/python-secure-coding-guide

Toutes les issues de ossf/python-secure-coding-guide

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues Python

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.