Hacktoberfest 2026 : les issues que les mainteneurs ont marquées pour octobre, ouvertes et accessibles aux débutants. Parcourir les issues Hacktoberfest

[Task][RFC]: Deliver the live team correction and adoption workspace

Ouverte
  • Quelque chose ne va pas ?
#5,210 0 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
5/5
Temps estimé
Plus d'une semaine
Accessibilité débutants
25/100
Type d'issue
Fonctionnalité
Clarté
Plutôt claire
Activité
Active
Stack technique
python
Domaine
ai-infra-agents, frontend

Piste de recherche

Read the linked RFC and check the current owners and PRs for #4376, #4339, and #3786 before choosing an unowned acceptance gap. The issue points to the personal-workspace frontend, control_plane/collaboration, and golden-queries.md as starting points; verify the relevant entrypoints and tests for the gap you claim. Done means the accepted scope is evidenced against the listed acceptance criteria, with commands and passed, failed, and untested results recorded.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

direction/architecture-evolution

Outcome / 目标

交付可理解的团队纠正、验收与采纳工作区。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.

Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S3/S5/S7 · R2/R3, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.

Current boundary

Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.

#4828 shipped Goal Chat result/comparison and bounded team inspection. The RFC’s current L1 correction episode and L2 continuous-team qualification remain the acceptance targets; #4376 is an existing open workspace implementation.

Work remaining

  • Complete one visible objection → revised artifact → independent acceptance → requester adoption episode using existing source/receipt identities.
  • Include correction/stop feedback, evidence navigation, reconnect and original-coordinator continuation. Qualify two cycles before sustained-team claims; scale/semantic zoom follows that result.

Ownership and ongoing work

Reuse #4376, #4339 and #3786 plus the App conversation tracker. Current execution/return work is active. Do not create another orchestration store, demand a 3D rewrite or raise concurrency before the RFC’s L1/L2 exits.

Contribution route: implementation/integration overlaps active work. Start from the linked current owners/PRs and identify an unowned acceptance gap in a claim comment; do not begin a competing rewrite.

Acceptance

  • A user can identify the claim that changed, why it changed and the accepted adopted revision in the packaged frontend and CLI.
  • Quiet/failed/stale/disconnected states are truthful; scoped stop does not claim unowned work stopped.
  • No synthetic activity is shown as live; repeated events, late results and reconnect do not duplicate progress or lose evidence.
  • Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.

Starting points and delivery boundary

Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.

Langage dominant
Python
Étoiles
6.2k
Forks
596
Merge moyen
7 h 47 min
PR mergées (30 j)
904

Préparer son environnement

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de loopx-project/loopx

Toutes les issues de loopx-project/loopx

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues Python

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.