start-proxy selects an AMD64 binary on Linux ARM64
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Accessibilité débutants
- 48/100
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Activité
- Active
- Stack technique
- github-actions, typescript
Piste de recherche
Read getProxyPackage() and getDownloadUrl() in src/start-proxy.ts, then inspect the existing proxy release assets and fallback behavior. Determine whether a native Linux ARM64 artifact exists or whether unsupported architectures must fail explicitly. Done means Linux x64 and arm64 selection and fallback behavior are covered by tests, with a clear diagnostic when no compatible artifact is available.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
Problem
The CodeQL CLI now has native Linux ARM64 support in beta, but the managed private-registry proxy still selects and downloads an AMD64 executable on Linux ARM64. This prevents the proxy from running natively even when CodeQL analysis itself can run.
This report concerns the proxy artifact and architecture selection, not generic CodeQL CLI ARM64 support, registry credentials, custom CA certificates, or outbound network access.
Source and public release evidence
Source inspected on September 25, 2026: fa8392b7e54a5d74a53270a4aa7defa307aa415c.
getProxyPackage()selects byprocess.platformonly. Every Linux host receivesupdate-job-proxy-linux64.tar.gz;process.archis not checked.getDownloadUrl()looks for that filename in the CodeQL bundle release, then falls back to the hard-coded v2.22.0 release.- The v2.27.0 release contains a native
codeql-bundle-linux-arm64CLI bundle, but the proxy assets are onlylinux64,osx64, andwin64. - Fresh inspection of both Linux proxy archives below found ELF
e_machine=62(EM_X86_64), not183(EM_AARCH64). Downloaded archive hashes match the digests returned by the GitHub Releases API.
| Proxy release | ELF architecture | Archive SHA-256 |
|---|---|---|
| v2.27.0 | AMD64 / e_machine=62 |
77197411d8fe7c6d157f694e2e4edd6b94bf7d9d10c667864cd6a113c31f97b2 |
| v2.22.0 fallback | AMD64 / e_machine=62 |
caed6d4ad41849570f6c62f784f20f9414a82738b120f464d7fcad1640f7900b |
Public-only reproduction
This inspects public artifacts without executing them, extracting them to disk, accessing a private registry, or requiring credentials. It can run on any host with curl and Python 3; the affected execution platform is native Linux ARM64 without x86 emulation.
for version in 2.27.0 2.22.0; do
curl --fail --silent --show-error --location \
"https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases/download/codeql-bundle-v${version}/update-job-proxy-linux64.tar.gz" \
-o "proxy-v${version}.tar.gz" || exit 1
done
python3 - <<'PY'
import tarfile
from pathlib import Path
for version in ("2.27.0", "2.22.0"):
with tarfile.open(f"proxy-v{version}.tar.gz", "r:gz") as archive:
members = [
member for member in archive.getmembers()
if member.isfile() and Path(member.name).name == "update-job-proxy"
]
assert len(members) == 1
header = archive.extractfile(members[0]).read(64)
assert header[:4] == b"\x7fELF"
assert header[5] in (1, 2)
byteorder = "little" if header[5] == 1 else "big"
machine = int.from_bytes(header[18:20], byteorder)
print(f"{version}: ELF e_machine={machine} (62=AMD64, 183=AArch64)")
PY
Actual output:
2.27.0: ELF e_machine=62 (62=AMD64, 183=AArch64)
2.22.0: ELF e_machine=62 (62=AMD64, 183=AArch64)
Native-run observation and impact
A September 21, 2026 managed CodeQL run on native Linux ARM64, Ubuntu 26.04.1, with CLI 2.27.0 uploaded analyses successfully, but its local registry-proxy connection tests failed with ECONNREFUSED; proxy cleanup reported ESRCH. This earlier runtime observation is separate from the fresh public-artifact inspection above; no new managed scan was triggered for this report.
Successful analysis upload therefore did not establish successful private-dependency resolution. The architecture mismatch can be verified independently of that runner OS version and of any particular private registry. An x64 runner remains the workaround for this proxy path.
Expected behavior
Select a native Linux ARM64 proxy artifact when process.arch === "arm64", including an architecture-compatible fallback. Until such an artifact is available, fail early with an explicit unsupported-architecture diagnostic rather than attempting to start the AMD64 executable. Tests should cover Linux x64 and arm64 selection and fallback behavior.
Could the maintainers confirm whether private-registry proxy support is intended to be part of Linux ARM64 CodeQL support, or whether this remains an unsupported combination that should be documented explicitly?
Related, but distinct
#3530 and #3531 address proxy startup retries and false-success/readiness reporting. They may explain why a dead proxy is not surfaced clearly, but they do not add an ARM64 proxy artifact or change architecture selection. This report tracks that architecture gap separately.
- Langage dominant
- TypeScript
- Étoiles
- 1.6k
- Forks
- 493
- Merge moyen
- 1 j 10 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 52
Préparer son environnement
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de github/codeql-action
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 68/100
github/codeql-action#4052 · 4 commentaires ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 45/100
github/codeql-action#4078 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 48/100
github/codeql-action#4008 · 9 commentaires ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 52/100
github/codeql-action#3978 · 4 commentaires · 1 réaction ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 3/5 1-2 jours Accessibilité débutants 48/100
github/codeql-action#3915 · 6 commentaires · 3 réactions ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Toutes les issues de github/codeql-action
Issues similaires
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 84/100
opengovsg/FormSG#10118 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
ai-driven-qa bug claude
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 75/100
linagora/twake-calendar-frontend#1434 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Add: MBC kr [Geo-blocked]Ouvertecheck:passed streams:add
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 70/100
iptv-org/iptv#52824 · 2 commentaires ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 Une demi-journée Accessibilité débutants 78/100
jaegertracing/jaeger-ui#4512 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:ide documentation enhancement platform:macos platform:vscode
Difficulté 1/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 88/100
anthropics/claude-code#97389 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour