[coverage] Conformance findings: METADATA-035,STATEMENT-023
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Accessibilité débutants
- 48/100
Piste de recherche
Commencez par le diff du PR de couverture sous tests/, en particulier test_get_tables_empty_table_types_filter_matches_all et test_failed_statement_error_carries_sql_state, puis suivez les chemins correspondants du backend Thrift. Reproduisez l’instruction SQL visant la table inexistante et comparez Thrift au backend du kernel. C’est terminé lorsque les deux tests d’échec attendu passent : un table_types vide correspond à tous les types et les instructions en échec exposent SQLSTATE 42P01 avec le texte d’erreur attendu.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
Summary
Surfaced by the multi-language coverage fan-out while conformance-testing these SPEC-IDs against databricks/databricks-sql-python. Each finding is committed as an expected-failure (xfail) test in the coverage PR — the test asserts the CORRECT (post-fix) behavior and stays red until THIS driver (databricks/databricks-sql-python) is fixed, then flips green as a tripwire.
Findings
- METADATA-035 [thrift]: Thrift backend forwards an empty getTables table_types list verbatim as TGetTablesReq(tableTypes=[]), so the server treats it as match-none and returns zero rows instead of behaving like None (match all types); the kernel backend correctly normalises [] to None
- failing test:
test_get_tables_empty_table_types_filter_matches_all(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)
- failing test:
- STATEMENT-023 [thrift]: Thrift backend drops the server SQLSTATE on a FAILED statement: it builds exceptions from errorMessage/displayMessage only and never copies TStatus.sqlState / TGetOperationStatusResp.sqlState, so no PEP 249 error attribute carries 42P01 for TABLE_OR_VIEW_NOT_FOUND; the kernel backend does forward sql_state
- failing test:
test_failed_statement_error_carries_sql_state(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)
- failing test:
Reproduce & Expected
STATEMENT-023 — Validates that when the server resolves a statement to a FAILED state, the driver surfaces the server's SQLSTATE on the raised error — not just a free-text message. A statement whose SQLSTATE is stable and server-assigned is used: a reference to a table that does not exist, which Databricks reports as TABLE_OR_VIEW_NOT_FOUND with SQLSTATE 42P01. The raised error must expose that SQLSTATE through the driver's standard error surface (ADBC AdbcException.SqlState, JDBC SQLException.getSQLState(), DBAPI error attributes, ODBC SQLGetDiagRec SQLSTATE, etc.). This pins the portable half of the cross-protocol error contract: consumers branch on the status/SQLSTATE pair, so both protocols must populate it identically even though each raises its own natural concrete exception class. The CONCRETE exception TYPE is deliberately NOT asserted — it legitimately differs per protocol and per driver (the reference driver raises DatabricksException on SEA and HiveServer2Exception on Thrift), so requiring one class would encode a driver-internal detail rather than the contract.
Reproduce:
SELECT * FROM nonexistent_catalog_xyz123.nonexistent_schema.nonexistent_table
Expected (per the shared spec):
- full assertion contract:
result:
- error:
sql_state: 42P01
- error:
contains:
- TABLE_OR_VIEW_NOT_FOUND
- not found
- cannot be found
Context
- The behavior was first fixed in a DIFFERENT driver — reference PR: https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/604 — which seeded the shared language-neutral spec. This issue tracks the same conformance gap in databricks/databricks-sql-python; the reference PR is for cross-referencing the intended behavior, NOT a change to this repo.
- Coverage PR carrying the reproducing xfail test(s): https://github.com/databricks/databricks-driver-test/pull/1072
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 233
- Forks
- 152
- Merge moyen
- 21 h 5 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 10
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de databricks/databricks-sql-python
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 76/100
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 84/100
Toutes les issues de databricks/databricks-sql-python
Issues similaires
-
essnmx good first issue
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 95/100
-
[Feature] 奇物选择添加优先级 Ouverte
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 65/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 ·
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 75/100
Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · 1 commentaire ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success Ouvertearea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 70/100
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·