[Bug][Blueprint] Cron-triggered pipelines use a sanitized plan after PATCH /blueprints, gitextractor fails with masked credentials
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 3 jours
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 1-2 jours
- Accessibilité débutants
- 56/100
Piste de recherche
Read backend/server/services/blueprint.go around PatchBlueprint, saveBlueprint, and reloadBlueprint, then inspect SanitizeBlueprint and pluginOptionSanitizers in backend/server/services/pipeline.go. Trace how the cron job and API response share the blueprint plan, then review existing blueprint service tests. Done means cron runs after a PATCH use the stored credentials while the API response still masks them.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
Search before asking
- I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.
What happened
After updating an advanced-mode blueprint through the API (PATCH /blueprints/:id), the next pipeline started by the cron schedule runs with a sanitized (masked) plan. Every gitextractor task fails with:
subtask Clone Git Repo ended unexpectedly
git cmd [git clone https://git:*****@<gitlab-host>/<group>/<repo>.git /tmp/gitextractorXXXX --bare] failed
remote: HTTP Basic: Access denied. ...
The token stored in the database is correct:
- Triggering the same blueprint manually (
POST /blueprints/:id/trigger) clones every repo fine. - After a
lakerestart, cron runs work again until the next PATCH.
In our case it was 1330/1330 gitextractor tasks failing in a cron run, while the same repos cloned fine in a manual run of the same plan a few hours earlier.
Root cause (v1.0.3-beta15, still present on main):
PatchBlueprint→saveBlueprint→reloadBlueprint(blueprint)registers the cron job with the same pointer:
cronManager.AddJob(blueprint.CronConfig, &BlueprintJob{blueprint})(backend/server/services/blueprint.go).- Right after saving,
PatchBlueprintcallsSanitizeBlueprint(blueprint)on that same object to build the API response. - The
gitextractorsanitizer (pluginOptionSanitizersinbackend/server/services/pipeline.go) replaces the password inoptions["url"]with*in place. - When the cron fires,
BlueprintJob.Run()callscreatePipelineByBlueprint(bj.Blueprint, ...), which for advanced mode usesblueprint.Planas is. The new pipeline gets the masked URL.
TriggerBlueprint and ReloadBlueprints (at startup) load the blueprint from the DB, which is why manual runs and runs after a restart are fine. Normal-mode blueprints are not affected, because their plan is regenerated from the connections on each run.
What do you expect to happen
Cron-triggered pipelines should use the stored (unsanitized) plan, the same as manual triggers. Sanitizing the API response should not change the object the scheduler holds.
How to reproduce
- Create an advanced-mode blueprint with a
gitextractortask whoseurlcontains credentials (https://git:<token>@host/group/repo.git), withenable: true,isManual: falseand a cron, e.g.*/5 * * * *. - Update it through the API, e.g.
PATCH /blueprints/:idwith{"cronConfig": "*/5 * * * *"}or with a newplan. - Wait for the cron to fire.
- The
gitextractortask fails withHTTP Basic: Access denied, and the pipeline's task options show the masked URL. - Trigger the same blueprint with
POST /blueprints/:id/trigger: it succeeds.
Anything else
Possible fixes, either of:
- In
BlueprintJob.Run(), reload the blueprint from the DB by id before creating the pipeline. - In
PatchBlueprint(and other handlers that sanitize aftersaveBlueprint), sanitize a deep copy rather than the object passed toreloadBlueprint.SanitizeBlueprintwrites intoblueprint.Plan[i][j], and the option maps are shared.
Workaround: set the blueprint to manual and trigger it from an external scheduler with POST /blueprints/:id/trigger, or restart lake after every blueprint update.
Version
v1.0.3-beta15 (helm chart 1.0.3-beta15). Code verified unchanged on main.
Are you willing to submit PR?
- Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
Code of Conduct
- I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
- Langage dominant
- Go
- Étoiles
- 3.2k
- Forks
- 824
- Merge moyen
- 2 j 22 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 46
Préparer son environnement
Lance le conteneur de développement du projet dans votre navigateur, avec votre propre compte GitHub.
- Aucun Dockerfile ni fichier Docker Compose
- Propose un modèle de pull request
- Aucun guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de apache/devlake
-
[Bug][SonarQube] Migration 20230927145127 is not re-runnable: fails with "constraint _tool_sonarqube_file_metrics_pkey does not exist" after an interrupted runPeut-être pris @chenwei791129 l’a pris il y a 1 jour. Ouverte
Difficulté 3/5 1-2 jours Accessibilité débutants 35/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 3 jours
-
type/bug
Difficulté 3/5 1-2 jours Accessibilité débutants 64/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 3 jours
-
[Bug][Blueprint] Scheduled run fails silently when plan generation errorsPeut-être pris @jcamargos l’a pris il y a 2 jours. Ouverte
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 25/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 3 jours
-
Difficulté 3/5 Une demi-journée Accessibilité débutants 62/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 3 jours
-
Difficulté 3/5 1-2 jours Accessibilité débutants 42/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 3 jours
Toutes les issues de apache/devlake
Issues similaires
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 76/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 82/100
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
-
bug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 2 jours
-
bug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 83/100
devlikeapro/waha#2322 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 2 jours