i2cioexpander inconsistencies and problems

Ouverte
#11,049 8 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
4/5
Temps estimé
3-5 jours
Accessibilité débutants
45/100
Type d'issue
Bug
Clarté
Plutôt claire
Activité
Calme
Stack technique
c
Domaine
embedded-iot

Piste de recherche

Start by reading reset_board_buses() in shared-module/board/__init__.c and compare its behavior with common_hal_i2cioexpander_ioexpander_construct() and common_hal_i2cdisplaybus_i2cdisplaybus_construct(). Then trace the CIRCUITPY_I2CIOEXPANDER defaults across ports. Done means the intended bus and pin reset behavior is consistent, including for external I2C devices and user-created expanders.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

bug digitalio
CircuitPython version and board name
main
Code/REPL
n.a.
Behavior

There are a number of inconsistencies across ports regarding the i2cioexpander module. Also, the behavior is not as intended:

  1. CIRCUITPY_I2CIOEXPANDER defaults to 0 for all ports except raspberrypi. That port sets the value to =1 (instead of ?=1), so it is impossible to override it in a mpconfigboard.mk file. While this sounds like just another module for the raspberrypi port, it also changes behavior as a side effect. Setting CIRCUITPY_I2CIOEXPANDER prevents resetting the board I2C bus (see reset_board_buses() in shared-module/board/__init__.c. So none of the raspberrypi boards reset the board I2C bus, while all espressif boards except the yotas do the reset.
  2. The coding in reset_board_buses() has two additional problems. It silently assumes that the ioexpander is an internal peripheral and not just a normal external i2c device. This assumption can be wrong.
  3. Major problem: not resetting the bus in this way does not prevent resetting the SCL/SDA pins. So although the bus is not explicitely reset, it is still unusable after the cleanup routines from main.c.

(1) is easy to solve.
(2) is debateble: treating ioexpanders as something special is possible, but the current implementation treats them differently if they are not on the board I2C bus.
(3) common_hal_i2cioexpander_ioexpander_construct() could call common_hal_busio_i2c_never_reset(), like common_hal_i2cdisplaybus_i2cdisplaybus_construct() does. As an alternative, this can be added to all boards that create an ioexpander and treat all ioexpander instances created from user code as "normal" i2c devices.

Description

No response

Additional information

No response

Langage dominant
C
Étoiles
4.6k
Forks
1.4k
Merge moyen
1 j 8 h
PR mergées (30 j)
183

Préparer son environnement

Ce projet ne fournit ni conteneur de développement, ni Dockerfile, ni guide de contribution : l'installation est à votre charge. Commencez par son README, et consultez notre guide de la première contribution pour les étapes générales.

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de adafruit/circuitpython

Toutes les issues de adafruit/circuitpython

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues C

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.