useId values depend on render order, so a lazy component loaded only on the server makes hydration discard server HTML (0.3.1)

Ouverte
#155 0 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
4/5
Temps estimé
3-5 jours
Accessibilité débutants
54/100
Type d'issue
Bug
Clarté
Clairement spécifiée
Activité
Active
Stack technique
react, typescript
Domaine
frontend

Piste de recherche

Start by reading the ID counters in server/dispatcher.ts and dom/dispatcher.ts, then trace how the server and browser assign IDs when a lazy component suspends only in the browser. Reproduce the issue with the provided field.jsx, app.jsx, server.jsx, and client.jsx example by calling render() twice before hydration. Done means the second server render hydrates without replacing the section or either label.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

Summary

Redact's useId values depend on render order, so they change when a lazy component is already loaded on the server but not yet in the browser. The ID mismatch makes Redact silently discard the server-rendered section and render it again on the client. React keeps all of its server HTML in the same app.

This is the normal case on a running server: the lazy module loads on the first request and renders inline from then on, while each new visitor's browser still has to fetch it.

Reproduction

field.jsx

import { useId } from 'react'

export default function LazyField() {
  const id = useId()
  return <label id={id}>lazy</label>
}

app.jsx

import { Suspense, lazy, useId } from 'react'

const LazyField = lazy(() => import('./field.jsx'))

function Field() {
  const id = useId()
  return <label id={id}>eager</label>
}

export function App() {
  return (
    <main>
      <Suspense fallback={<p>loading section</p>}>
        <section>
          <Suspense fallback={<p>loading field</p>}>
            <LazyField />
          </Suspense>
          <Field />
        </section>
      </Suspense>
    </main>
  )
}

server.jsx

import { renderToReadableStream } from 'react-dom/server'
import { App } from './app.jsx'

export async function render() {
  const stream = await renderToReadableStream(<App />)
  await stream.allReady
  return new Response(stream).text()
}

client.jsx

import { hydrateRoot } from 'react-dom/client'
import { App } from './app.jsx'

hydrateRoot(document.getElementById('root'), <App />)

Build the server and client with and without the redact() plugin. Call render() twice and serve the second result, as a server would after its first request. Then load the client bundle.

Runtime Server HTML After hydration Server nodes Errors reported
React 19.3.1 _R_1_, _R_2_ _R_1_, _R_2_ All kept None
Redact 0.3.1 :R0, :R1 :r1, :r0 section and both labels replaced None

I checked node identity with a snapshot taken in an inline script before the client bundle loads. The result was the same across repeated runs.

The first render() doesn't show the problem. There the lazy component suspends on the server too, so the numbers happen to line up.

Cause

From reading the source, both sides use a counter in render order: frame.idCounter++ in server/dispatcher.ts and root.ic++ in dom/dispatcher.ts. In this case:

  1. The warm server renders LazyField first, so it gets :R0 and Field gets :R1.
  2. In the browser, LazyField suspends and its boundary is skipped, so Field takes :R0.
  3. :R0 doesn't match the server's :R1, so hydration of the outer boundary fails and it recovers by rendering on the client.

React avoids this by deriving IDs from tree position. Redact already has that logic on the client for native React servers (identifierStrategy: 'react'), so using tree-position IDs on Redact's own server may be one way to fix it. I haven't tested that.

Real-world impact

In a TanStack Start app with code-split components, the top section of a page was rebuilt about 150 ms after load for signed-in visitors, which throws away the work the server already did. An experimental patch that corrected the mismatched attribute in place stopped the rebuild, which points to the ID mismatch as the trigger.

Because nothing is reported, this is easy to miss. No error is logged in a production build unless the app has passed its own onRecoverableError, and I didn't test that path.

Environment
  • @tanstack/redact 0.3.1, default redact() preset
  • React 19.3.1 (control)
  • Vite 7.3.7, @vitejs/plugin-react 5.2.0
  • Chromium 156 (Playwright), Node 26
Langage dominant
TypeScript
Étoiles
537
Forks
22
Merge moyen
10 h 27 min
PR mergées (30 j)
40

Préparer son environnement

Ce projet ne fournit ni conteneur de développement, ni Dockerfile, ni guide de contribution : l'installation est à votre charge. Commencez par son README, et consultez notre guide de la première contribution pour les étapes générales.

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de TanStack/redact

Toutes les issues de TanStack/redact

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues TypeScript

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.