Human `scan --mode vendored --prune` silently skips the vendored GC when no remaining package has a patch, so an `npm uninstall`ed vendored entry is never reverted (exit 0), while `--json` reverts it and `vendor --check` keeps pointing at that same command
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 2/5
- Temps estimé
- 1-3 heures
- Accessibilité débutants
- 85/100
Piste de recherche
La cause racine se trouve dans crates/socket-patch-cli/src/commands/scan/mod.rs, autour des lignes 2673 et 2688, où le retour anticipé lorsque all_packages_with_patches est vide ignore le GC des dépendances vendored. Modifiez le flux de contrôle pour exécuter le GC des dépendances vendored dans ce cas, conformément au comportement du chemin --json. Exécutez la suite de tests scan existante pour vérifier que la correction résout l’écart entre la sortie destinée aux humains et la sortie JSON.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
[agent] Found by the scheduled npm bug-hunt routine (ledger #302).
Summary
You vendor a patched npm dependency, then remove it with npm uninstall. vendor --check then exits 1 with dependency removed … run socket-patch scan --mode vendored --prune to revert the vendored entry. When none of the project's remaining packages has a patch, running that command in human mode prints No patches available for installed packages., exits 0, and does nothing. The ledger entry and .socket/vendor/npm/<uuid>/ stay, and vendor --check still exits 1. The same command with --json does revert the entry (gc.revertedVendoredEntries: ["pkg:npm/[email protected]"]).
Impact
- The documented cleanup command doesn't work in the most common case: you removed your only patched dependency, or the only one left is unpatched.
vendor --checksends you to it, it exits 0, andvendor --checkstill fails. CI that gates onvendor --checkstays red until someone uses--json(by accident) orvendor --revert. - Because
--pruneis set, thevendor_ledger_entry_unwiredwarning is suppressed (prune_reverts_unwired, scan/mod.rs:1843). The human run gives no hint that anything was left behind. - Human and
--jsonoutput disagree about what the same command writes.
Repro (npm 10.9.4 / Node 22, also npm 12.2.0 / Node 24; local mock of the public patch proxy serving a free patch for [email protected])
mkdir p && cd p
echo '{"name":"p","version":"1.0.0","dependencies":{"left-pad":"1.3.0","ms":"2.1.3"}}' > package.json
npm install
socket-patch scan --mode vendored # exit 0, left-pad vendored
npm uninstall left-pad # ms has no patch
socket-patch vendor --check; echo $? # "dependency removed … run `socket-patch scan --mode vendored --prune`", 1
socket-patch scan --mode vendored --prune; echo $?
# Found 1 package (1 npm)
# No patches available for installed packages.
# 0
ls .socket/vendor/npm # 11111111-… still there; state.json still has left-pad
socket-patch vendor --check; echo $? # still 1
socket-patch scan --mode vendored --prune --json | jq .gc.revertedVendoredEntries
# ["pkg:npm/[email protected]"] ← JSON reverts it
Control: when a remaining package does have a patch (the mock also serves [email protected]), the human run prints GC: reverted 1 vendored entry and vendor --check goes green. When no packages are left at all, the zero-package path runs gc::run_vendor_only_gc, so that case works too. Only "packages found, none patched" is broken.
Expected vs actual
- Expected (CLI_CONTRACT.md, vendored mode paragraph): "an entry the lockfile in-use probe … proves unwired … A run without a non-hosted
--prunereports it through the run-levelvendor_ledger_entry_unwiredwarning; a--prunerun reverts it in its GC and exits 0. That GC runs even when the crawl found no packages". Also thescan --pruneparagraph: "(b) EVERY ledger entry whose dependency is no longer in the lockfile graph is reverted". - Actual: human mode, packages found but no patches: no GC, no warning, exit 0.
--json: GC runs and reverts the entry.
Matrix (Linux)
| npm | human --prune reverts |
--json --prune reverts |
runs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.9.4 (Node 22.22) | no | yes | ×3 (incl. a workspace member npm uninstall -w a) |
| 12.2.0 (Node 24) | no | n/a (not re-run) | ×1 |
| 10.9.4, a patched package remains | yes | yes | ×1 (control) |
This is not OS-specific: it comes from scan control flow, not from the filesystem, so I didn't push a probe branch. It's not npm-specific either: any vendored ecosystem whose remaining packages have no patches should hit it. v4.0.0 can't vendor against this mock (a different vendoring flow), so there's no release bisect. main's history is grafted at 23fd62e, so the first bad commit can't be bisected.
Suspect code (main e2d9633)
crates/socket-patch-cli/src/commands/scan/mod.rs:2688:if all_packages_with_patches.is_empty() { … return finish_human(0).await; }crates/socket-patch-cli/src/commands/scan/mod.rs:2673:finish_humanruns the GC onlyif prune && !vendor && !hosted, because the vendored arm "runs its own". On this early return the vendored arm never runs, so nothing does.- The JSON path runs
gc_json(scan/mod.rs:2633) regardless, which is why--jsonworks. scan/mod.rs:1843-1844:prune_reverts_unwiredsuppresses thevendor_ledger_entry_unwiredwarning on the assumption that the GC will run.
Backlog review — 2026-10-08
Priority: P1 → P2. The human scan early return skips vendored GC, leaving an obsolete entry and a failing vendor --check. This is a real cleanup/control-flow bug; --json or vendor --revert provides a workaround. The report establishes neither lost recovery data nor a false security attestation, so P2 is appropriate.
- Langage dominant
- Rust
- Étoiles
- 8
- Forks
- 0
- Merge moyen
- 22 h 30 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 329
Préparer son environnement
- Aucun Dockerfile ni fichier Docker Compose
- Aucun modèle de pull request
- Lire le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de SocketDev/socket-patch
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:pipenv priority:p1
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1219 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:bundler priority:p1
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 75/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1125 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:npm priority:p3
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 75/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1072 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
agent:triaged arch-audit bug priority:p3
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 85/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1062 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:bundler priority:p1
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 80/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1056 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Toutes les issues de SocketDev/socket-patch
Issues similaires
-
defect
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 74/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 74/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 82/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 2 jours
-
enhancement user-priority/P3
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 62/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 70/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour