[Bug] mtd-cfi erase-region parser has an off-by-one out-of-bounds write when sect_count reaches CFI_FLASH_SECT_MAX
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 2/5
- Temps estimé
- 1-3 heures
- Accessibilité débutants
- 45/100
- Type d'issue
- Bug
- Clarté
- Clairement spécifiée
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Stack technique
- c
- Domaine
- embedded-iot, security
Piste de recherche
Commencez dans components/drivers/mtd/mtd-cfi.c, plus précisément dans l’analyse des régions d’effacement CFI de cfi_flash_init(), et examinez comment sect_count indexe sect[] et protect[]. Utilisez l’émulateur CFI décrit, le harness de fuzzing ou des réponses de query forgées pour atteindre la limite de capacité ; c’est terminé lorsque la sonde n’écrit plus au-delà de l’un ou l’autre des deux tableaux fixes.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
RT-Thread Version
master (verified on commit 2b58dec87b584aa7ded6e8c736498716f8d29cd0)
Hardware Type/Architectures
systems using the new common MTD CFI NOR driver
Develop Toolchain
GCC
Describe the bug
Affected Components
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| File | components/drivers/mtd/mtd-cfi.c |
| Function | CFI probe / erase-region parsing logic in cfi_flash_init() |
| Struct | struct cfi_flash_device |
| Fixed arrays | sect[CFI_FLASH_SECT_MAX], protect[CFI_FLASH_SECT_MAX] |
Vulnerability Details
1. Fixed-capacity arrays indexed with an off-by-one check
The driver stores discovered flash sectors into two fixed-size arrays:
struct cfi_flash_device
{
struct rt_mtd_nor_device parent;
struct rt_mutex rw_lock;
rt_ubase_t sect[CFI_FLASH_SECT_MAX];
rt_ubase_t protect[CFI_FLASH_SECT_MAX];
rt_size_t sect_count;
...
};
In the erase-region parser, the driver iterates over CFI-reported erase regions and appends entries into sect[] and protect[]. The bound check is:
if (sect_count > RT_ARRAY_SIZE(fdev->sect))
{
LOG_E("Too many %d (> %d) sector found",
sect_count, RT_ARRAY_SIZE(fdev->sect));
break;
}
This condition should use >=, not >. As written, when sect_count == RT_ARRAY_SIZE(fdev->sect), the check still passes and the code performs:
fdev->sect[sect_count] = sect;
fdev->protect[sect_count] = ...;
which writes one element past the end of both arrays.
2. Overwrite driven by attacker-controlled CFI geometry
The number of iterations is derived from flash-reported CFI erase-region information:
value = rt_le32_to_cpu(get_unaligned(&query->erase_region_info[i]));
erase_region_count = (value & 0xffff) + 1;
value >>= 16;
erase_region_size = (value & 0xffff) ? ((value & 0xffff) * 256) : 128;
Then:
for (int j = 0; j < erase_region_count; ++j)
{
...
fdev->sect[sect_count] = sect;
...
fdev->protect[sect_count] = ...;
++sect_count;
}
A malicious, fuzzed, or emulated CFI NOR device can report enough erase-region data to drive sect_count up to exactly CFI_FLASH_SECT_MAX and trigger the off-by-one out-of-bounds write.
3. Concrete Vulnerable Code Path
for (int j = 0; j < erase_region_count; ++j)
{
if (sect - fdev->sect[0] >= fdev->size)
{
break;
}
if (sect_count > RT_ARRAY_SIZE(fdev->sect)) // ← should be >=
{
LOG_E("Too many %d (> %d) sector found",
sect_count, RT_ARRAY_SIZE(fdev->sect));
break;
}
fdev->sect[sect_count] = sect; // ← OOB write when sect_count == CFI_FLASH_SECT_MAX
sect += (erase_region_size * size_ratio);
switch (fdev->vendor)
{
case CFI_CMDSET_INTEL_PROG_REGIONS:
case CFI_CMDSET_INTEL_EXTENDED:
case CFI_CMDSET_INTEL_STANDARD:
cfi_flash_write_cmd(fdev, sect_count, 0, FLASH_CMD_READ_ID);
fdev->protect[sect_count] = cfi_flash_isset(fdev, // ← OOB write
sect_count, FLASH_OFFSET_PROTECT, FLASH_STATUS_PROTECT);
cfi_flash_write_cmd(fdev, sect_count, 0, FLASH_CMD_RESET);
break;
case CFI_CMDSET_AMD_EXTENDED:
case CFI_CMDSET_AMD_STANDARD:
default:
fdev->protect[sect_count] = RT_NULL; // ← OOB write
}
++sect_count;
}
At the point sect_count == CFI_FLASH_SECT_MAX, both fdev->sect[sect_count] and fdev->protect[sect_count] are out-of-bounds accesses.
Trigger Condition
The bug is reached during normal CFI probe/initialization of a NOR flash device. No local code modification is required. A malicious or emulated flash device only needs to provide CFI data with enough erase-region entries/counts to drive sect_count to exactly CFI_FLASH_SECT_MAX.
Proof of Concept
A PoC can be implemented with a CFI NOR emulator, a fuzzing harness that emulates the CFI query table, or a hardware test setup capable of returning crafted CFI query responses.
PoC Shape
Construct CFI erase-region information such that:
- The parser continues adding sectors until
sect_count == 512 - At least one more sector append is attempted
At that point, the code will still pass the > bound check and perform:
fdev->sect[512] = ...
fdev->protect[512] = ...
even though both arrays are sized for indices 0..511.
Minimal Reproduction Steps
- Build RT-Thread with the new common MTD CFI NOR driver enabled.
- Provide a CFI-compatible flash device or emulator that reports enough erase regions/sectors to reach
sect_count == 512. - Trigger flash probe/initialization.
- Observe an out-of-bounds write when the parser appends the 513th entry.
Expected Result
The current code writes one element past the end of fdev->sect[] and fdev->protect[], potentially corrupting adjacent fields in struct cfi_flash_device or nearby memory depending on layout and build configuration.
Impact
The immediate impact is memory corruption during flash probe. Because this occurs while parsing externally supplied CFI geometry data, the bug may lead to:
- crash during probe
- corrupted flash metadata
- undefined behavior in later MTD operations
- possible corruption of adjacent driver state
Code execution has not been demonstrated.
Upstream / Downstream Impact
Upstream
Verified on current master in the new common MTD CFI NOR driver.
Downstream
Any downstream product based on current master that enables the common MTD CFI NOR driver and probes untrusted, emulated, or malformed CFI flash devices may be affected.
Suggested Fix
Change the bounds check to use >= to reject writes once sect_count reaches array capacity:
if (sect_count >= RT_ARRAY_SIZE(fdev->sect))
{
LOG_E("Too many %d (>= %d) sector found",
sect_count, RT_ARRAY_SIZE(fdev->sect));
break;
}
Additionally consider:
- Validating the total accumulated number of sectors before the inner loop writes.
- Validating erase-region count values more defensively.
- Failing probe hard instead of silently truncating partially parsed geometry.
Kindly let me know if you intend to request a CVE ID upon confirmation of the vulnerability.
Other additional context
No response
- Langage dominant
- C
- Étoiles
- 12.3k
- Forks
- 5.5k
- Merge moyen
- 6 j 11 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 30
Préparer son environnement
Lance le conteneur de développement du projet dans votre navigateur, avec votre propre compte GitHub.
- Aucun Dockerfile ni fichier Docker Compose
- Propose un modèle de pull request
- Lire le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de RT-Thread/rt-thread
-
[bsp][stm32][bluepill] README「快速上手」缺少重新生成 MDK 工程这一步,按文档操作无法编译通过Peut-être pris @moment-NEW l’a pris il y a 11 jours. Ouvertein progress
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 75/100
RT-Thread/rt-thread#11818 · 4 commentaires · 1 personne assignée ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
BSP BSP: Loongson bug RT-Smart
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
RT-Thread/rt-thread#11717 · 2 commentaires ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Arch: RISC-V BSP BSP: HPMicro bug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
RT-Thread/rt-thread#11687 · 3 commentaires ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 68/100
RT-Thread/rt-thread#11472 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
[Bug] [netdev] ping still applies delay after the last packet and calls rt_thread_delay(0) returning -RT_EINVALPeut-être pris @ymj0440 l’a pris aujourd’hui. Ouvertein progress
RT-Thread/rt-thread#11865 · 3 commentaires · 1 personne assignée ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Toutes les issues de RT-Thread/rt-thread
Issues similaires
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 70/100
DaveGamble/cJSON#1100 ·
-
UB: (int) cast of a user double outside int range in dispatch / vm_index_is_int / flat_index_atOuvertearea:runtime-vm
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
InauguralSystems/EigenScript#1748 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
bug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 76/100
leanprover/lean4#15677 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 2 jours
-
bug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 68/100
wasm-micro-runtime/wasm-micro-runtime#5159 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 7 jours