back_prop, stats_examples, endogenous_lake, multi_hyper: four small fixes

Ouverte
#1,111 0 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
3/5
Temps estimé
1-2 jours
Accessibilité débutants
72/100
Type d'issue
Bug
Clarté
Clairement spécifiée
Activité
Active
Stack technique
python
Domaine
data, documentation

Piste de recherche

Read the four named lecture files at the cited sections: lectures/back_prop.md, lectures/stats_examples.md, lectures/endogenous_lake.md, and lectures/multi_hyper.md. Check the described training shuffle, Pascal formulas, job-finding comparison and message, and count loop length against the issue. Done when each listed correction is reflected and the install cell remains runnable.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

Four small things found while these lectures were reviewed on their way into the shared lecture pool (QuantEcon/lectures#44). None is urgent. Line numbers are at 4d82fff.

  • lectures/back_prop.md, train (line 501): each epoch splits key, but line 504 draws the permutation from a fixed random.key(1), so the data come in the same order every epoch and the key argument has no effect. key, subkey = random.split(key) followed by random.permutation(subkey, indices) shuffles as intended.
  • lectures/stats_examples.md, the Pascal (negative binomial) section (lines 121–122): the mean and variance are written with $k$, the value of $X$, where the parameter $r$ belongs: they should read $\mathbb{E}(X) = r(1-p)/p$ and $\mathbb{V}(X) = r(1-p)/p^2$.
  • lectures/endogenous_lake.md, the job-finding rate (lines 338, 464 and 496): the text accepts an offer when $w \geq \bar w$ (lines 84 and 319), but the code counts w_vec > w_bar. Since w_bar is the first grid wage at which accepting is optimal (jnp.searchsorted(V - U, 0)), the strict inequality treats the reservation wage itself as rejected and understates $\lambda$ by $\gamma , p(\bar w)$; >= matches the text. The message printed at line 339 also reads "paramters".
  • lectures/multi_hyper.md, count (line 391): it takes its loop length from the global sample (size = sample.shape[0], line 392) rather than from its own arguments. It gives the right answer here, since it is only called with columns of sample, but Numba freezes global arrays when it compiles, so size = vec1.shape[0] is the safer form.

The same review asked for skip-execution on back_prop's install cell, but that cell is meant to run: the lecture uses kaleido and plotly afterwards.

When these land here, the pool picks them up through its nightly refresh.

Langage dominant
TeX
Étoiles
129
Forks
59
Merge moyen
2 j 10 h
PR mergées (30 j)
11

Préparer son environnement

Ce projet ne fournit ni conteneur de développement, ni Dockerfile, ni guide de contribution : l'installation est à votre charge. Commencez par son README, et consultez notre guide de la première contribution pour les étapes générales.

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de QuantEcon/lecture-python.myst

Toutes les issues de QuantEcon/lecture-python.myst

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues Data Engineering

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.