Hacktoberfest 2026 : les issues que les mainteneurs ont marquées pour octobre, ouvertes et accessibles aux débutants. Parcourir les issues Hacktoberfest

noisy `-32801` ("Content Modified") errors

Ouverte
#3,420 4 commentaires 6 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
4/5
Temps estimé
3-5 jours
Accessibilité débutants
48/100
Type d'issue
Bug
Clarté
Plutôt claire
Activité
Calme
Stack technique
lua, neovim
Domaine
devtools

Piste de recherche

Commencez par suivre le chemin de la requête textDocument/semanticTokens/full et la manière dont les notifications textDocument/didChange affectent les requêtes en cours. Comparez ce comportement avec la spécification LSP responseError.code ; le travail est terminé lorsque les changements de document normalement mis en file d’attente ne produisent plus -32801, tandis que les modifications véritablement externes peuvent toujours le produire.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

bug
How are you using the lua-language-server?

NeoVim

Which OS are you using?

MacOS

What is the issue affecting?

Other

Expected Behaviour

In the request-completion path, when the server has computed a result against document version V, return that result regardless of whether didChange for V+1 (or later) has since arrived. Only return -32801 if the document
modification was genuinely external / out-of-band — which is rare in normal usage and not what didChange represents.

If pre-empting in-flight requests on didChange is desired as an optimization, the spec-compliant signal is for the client to send $/cancelRequest. The server should not unilaterally short-circuit valid in-flight work with -32801.

Per the spec, the client is supposed to handle staleness via cancellation. With lua-language-server pre-empting that decision and erroring instead:

  • Clients that handle -32801 strictly as an error end up logging spurious errors (cf. neovim/neovim#40208).
  • Clients that could have used the older-version result (perfectly valid per the spec — "even computed on an older state might still be useful") never get the chance.
  • Clients that wanted to cancel can no longer rely on $/cancelRequest semantics because the server has already aborted on its own initiative.
Actual Behaviour

Sending a fast sequence of didChanges while semantic-tokens requests are in flight causes the server to error every in-flight request with:

{ "code": -32801, "message": "Content modified." }

even though the modification was delivered through normal didChange notifications, not "outside normal conditions."

Reproduction steps
  1. Open a Lua file in any LSP-capable editor that requests semanticTokens/full (e.g. Neovim 0.12+).
  2. Start typing across multiple lines, fast enough that successive didChange notifications outpace the server's processing.
  3. Observe: every in-flight semantic-tokens request comes back with -32801 Content modified. instead of a (possibly stale) result.
Additional Notes

lua-language-server returns LSP error -32801 ("Content Modified") in response to textDocument/semanticTokens/full (and likely other requests) whenever a textDocument/didChange notification arrives before the response is sent.
This contradicts the LSP specification, which explicitly forbids using -32801 for content changes detected in unprocessed messages — i.e. for the exact case currently being signaled.

What the spec says:

LSP §responseError.code (specifically the ContentModified = -32801 entry):

The server detected that the content of a document got modified outside normal conditions. A server should NOT send this error code if it detects a content change in its unprocessed messages. The result even computed on an older
state might still be useful for the client.

If a client decides that a result is not of any use anymore the client should cancel the request.

So the intended semantics are:

  • -32801 is for "out-of-band" content modification (e.g., the file on disk changed in a way the server can't reconcile with its in-flight state).
Log File

No response

Langage dominant
Lua
Étoiles
4.4k
Forks
442
Merge moyen
8 j 9 h
PR mergées (30 j)
1

Guide de contribution

Ouvrir le guide de contribution

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de LuaLS/lua-language-server

Toutes les issues de LuaLS/lua-language-server

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues Lua

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.