[MetaROR] Points for discussion (reviewer-conflict decisions)
@LukasWallrich is already working on this.
Since Jun 26, 2026.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.
Description
Items where reviewer opinions conflict or where the right approach needs authorial judgement. Decide the direction here first; the concrete edit then moves to the relevant chapter / structural issue.
- #54
- Depth vs breadth trade-off. R3 wants more hands-on guidance and practical detail; R1 wants the MRI section pared back. How deep should the handbook go on any single topic? (links the MRI item in Content gaps)
- #51
- Preregistration section in Chapter 5. R1 says remove the confused paragraph about fraudulent preregistration; R2 appreciates the mention of preregistration as open science "in action". Decide how much space preregistration deserves and what angle to take. (R1, R2) <- already partly done, will be clearer when merged with replications
- #55
- Multiverse analysis. Only mentioned in Table 4.1 but not discussed in the text. Decide whether to add a substantive discussion or remove it from the table. (R3) (#56)
- #58
Related existing issues:
- #4 Extend discussion on disagreement about replication success
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 3
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from forrtproject/replication-handbook
-
Remove multiverse from table 4.1, instead briefly add in executing reproductions with referencePossibly taken @LukasWallrich claimed this 54 days ago. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
-
Remove how to cite from landing page - duplicates footerPossibly taken @LukasWallrich claimed this 54 days ago. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 64/100
-
Broken citationsOpen
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
forrtproject/replication-handbook#3 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
forrtproject/replication-handbook#58 · 1 comment ·