[MetaROR] Ch3 Choosing the Target Study — author revisions
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- tex
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Review Chapter 3 with the MetaROR reviews (R1, R2) and internal notes, then check issue #37 and commit 60e9e79 for the revisions already handled. Done means confirming the remaining structural reorganisation is tracked under the stated scope issue rather than making changes here.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Author revisions for Chapter 3 (Choosing the Target Study) from the MetaROR reviews (R1, R2) and internal notes.
- Move the generalizability/boundary-conditions paragraph out of the Uncertainty section — it disrupts the flow. (R1) (in #37)
- Clarify whether "Uncertainty > Theoretical contribution" and "Uncertainty > Availability of reproductions and replications" are intended as enumerated subsections or parts of the Uncertainty discussion. (R2) (in #37)
- Add a brief mention of "replication packages" with a forward reference to Section 5.1. (R2) (in #37)
- Reconsider citing Soto as evidence of a field's high replicability — at most it tests a small subset of the field. (Lukas) (already removed in 60e9e79)
Handled in other issues:
- Move Section 4.1 (Post-Publication Conversations) into Chapter 3; reconsider whether Section 3.4 (Researcher Bias) fits Chapter 3 → Structural reorganisation & scope
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 3
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from forrtproject/replication-handbook
-
Remove multiverse from table 4.1, instead briefly add in executing reproductions with referencePossibly taken @LukasWallrich claimed this 71 days ago. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
-
Remove how to cite from landing page - duplicates footerPossibly taken @LukasWallrich claimed this 71 days ago. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 64/100
-
Broken citationsOpen
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
forrtproject/replication-handbook#3 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
forrtproject/replication-handbook#58 · 1 comment ·
All issues in forrtproject/replication-handbook
Similar issues
-
TLS guide repeats certs/ in the certificate directoryPossibly taken @maheshrijal claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
prometheus/docs#3156 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 75/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
feedback simulation workshop
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 64/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5009 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Course help wanted Sensei
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100