Address security risks flagged in risk assessment sweep
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Domain
- security
Research direction
Start by reviewing the skills.sh assessment details for firecrawl-website-design-clone and firecrawl-demo-walkthrough, then compare the widespread Snyk medium-risk findings for a shared dependency. Done means the two high-risk items are triaged and remediated, shared findings are reviewed, and remediation or accepted-risk decisions are documented for each skill.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Security Risk Assessments need to be addressed
A security risk assessment sweep across the Firecrawl skills/workflows surfaced several flagged items that we need to triage and remediate. Transcribed from the assessment dashboard below (Gen / Socket / Snyk scanners).
Highest priority
firecrawl-website-design-clone— High Risk (Gen)firecrawl-demo-walkthrough— High Risk (Snyk)
Full results
| Skill / Workflow | Gen | Socket | Snyk |
|---|---|---|---|
| firecrawl-company-directories | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-competitive-intel | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-dashboard-reporting | Safe | 0 alerts | Low Risk |
| firecrawl-deep-research | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-demo-walkthrough | Safe | 0 alerts | High Risk |
| firecrawl-knowledge-base | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-knowledge-ingest | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-lead-gen | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-lead-research | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-market-research | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-qa | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-research-papers | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-seo-audit | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-shop | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-website-design-clone | High Risk | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
| firecrawl-workflows | Safe | 0 alerts | Med Risk |
Details: https://skills.sh/firecrawl/firecrawl-workflows
Asks
- Triage the two High Risk items first (
website-design-clone,demo-walkthrough) - Review the widespread Med Risk (Snyk) findings — likely a shared dependency; bumping it may clear most rows at once
- Document remediation / accepted-risk decisions per skill
Source: Security Risk Assessments dashboard screenshot (2026-06-24).
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 212
- Forks
- 41
- Avg merge
- 18h 35m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from firecrawl/firecrawl-workflows
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 79/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
All issues in firecrawl/firecrawl-workflows
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#123881 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Open-Dev-Society/OpenStock#143 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
kube-tarian/sigrun#203 ·
-
Area: Infrastructure Chore Difficulty: Low Priority: Medium
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture#1835 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
🐞 bug 🧩 ai-context
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 83/100
owasp-noir/noir#3295 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day