[Swift] Support nested/compound property mappings (parity with React)

Open
#376 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
swift

Research direction

Start with the SwiftUI Code Connect documentation and the existing @FigmaInstance, @FigmaBoolean, and @FigmaEnum APIs; the issue provides no source files or tests to target. Compare their behavior with the React nested property helpers and determine how Swift should represent optional instances and compound mappings. Done means Swift can express both use cases and produces valid snippets; the issue leaves the API design open.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

feature request

Summary

React Code Connect supports nesting property helpers inside each other — figma.boolean wrapping figma.instance, figma.enum wrapping figma.enum, etc. This enables conditional rendering and compound property mappings. Swift Code Connect has no equivalent for any of these patterns, making it impossible to express common real-world component APIs.

Use Case 1: Conditionally omitting an optional instance

In React, you can conditionally include or omit an instance property (docs):

props: {
  icon: figma.boolean("Has Icon", {
    true: figma.instance("Icon"),
    false: undefined, // omitted from snippet
  }),
}

In Swift, @FigmaInstance with an optional type renders an empty value when no instance is selected, producing invalid code:

struct MyButton_CodeConnect: FigmaConnect {
  @FigmaInstance("Icon") var icon: Icon?

  var body: some View {
    MyButton("Submit", icon: icon) { }
  }
}

When no icon is selected:

MyButton("Submit", icon: ) { }
//                  ^^^^^ empty — not valid code

Expected: The parameter should either be omitted entirely (MyButton("Submit") { }) or render as nil.

This was discussed for React in #71 and #86, where figma.boolean wrapping was the solution.

Use Case 2: Combining multiple Figma properties into one code value

In React, you can nest figma.enum inside figma.enum to map combinations of Figma properties to a single code value (docs):

props: {
  type: figma.enum("Type", {
    "Secondary": figma.enum("Theme", {
      "Light": "secondary",
      "Dark": "secondary-dark",
    }),
    "Tertiary": figma.enum("Theme", {
      "Light": "tertiary",
      "Dark": "tertiary-dark",
    }),
  }),
}

In Swift, @FigmaEnum mappings are flat — each maps a single Figma property independently. There's no way to express "when Type=Secondary AND Theme=Dark, use .secondary(variation: .dark)":

// Forced to ignore Theme entirely:
@FigmaEnum("Type", mapping: [
  "Secondary": CookbookButton.Style.secondary(),
  "Tertiary": CookbookButton.Style.tertiary(),
])
var type: CookbookButton.Style = .primary()

Attempted Workaround: Variant-specific structs

The docs describe variant for mapping one Figma component to different code components (e.g. PrimaryButton vs DangerButton). We attempted using multiple FigmaConnect structs with the same component type but different variant restrictions to work around both use cases above.

This does not work — Figma only ever displays one of the snippets, regardless of which variant is active. The variant property appears to only function when each struct declares a different component type, as shown in the docs.

Proposal

Support nested/compound property mappings in Swift, bringing parity with React's composable helpers.

For optional instances (Use Case 1)

Option A: Automatically omit the parameter when a @FigmaInstance with an optional type resolves to nothing — consistent with how falsy props are omitted in React.

Option B: Add hideDefault to @FigmaInstance, consistent with the existing @FigmaEnum API:

@FigmaInstance("Icon", hideDefault: true) var icon: Icon?

Option C: Allow @FigmaBoolean to wrap @FigmaInstance:

@FigmaBoolean("Has Icon", mapping: [
  true: FigmaInstance("Icon"),
  false: nil,
])
var icon: Icon?
For compound property mappings (Use Case 2)

Allow nesting @FigmaEnum (or similar) inside @FigmaEnum mapping values:

@FigmaEnum("Type", mapping: [
  "Secondary": FigmaEnum("Theme", mapping: [
    "Light": CookbookButton.Style.secondary(),
    "Dark": CookbookButton.Style.secondary(variation: .dark),
  ]),
  "Tertiary": FigmaEnum("Theme", mapping: [
    "Light": CookbookButton.Style.tertiary(),
    "Dark": CookbookButton.Style.tertiary(variation: .dark),
  ]),
])
var type: CookbookButton.Style = .primary()

Environment

  • Code Connect version: 1.4.1
  • Platform: Swift (SwiftUI)
Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
1.6k
Forks
126
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Getting set up

This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from figma/code-connect

All issues in figma/code-connect

Similar issues

More TypeScript issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.