Missing details on Aria Digital Twin dataset evaluation subset

Open
  • Is something wrong?
#180 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Newbie friendliness
25/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Start with Appendix D.2 of the linked paper and verify how the Aria Digital Twin evaluation subset is described. Done means documenting the video indices and the frame-selection scheme used to obtain 40 frames, if the project has a suitable documentation location.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Hello SAM-3D!

Thank you for releasing this amazing work.
I would like to ask the subset details of Aria Digital Twin evaluation reported in the paper.

In Appendix D.2, the paper says:

Aria Digital Twin (Pan et al., 2023): We sample a smaller set of 40 video frames, with around 30 objects per scene.

Could you share the details of the video indices and the frame selection scheme to collect 40 video frames? This would significantly help follow-up research. Thank you so much !

Dominant language
Python
Stars
7.6k
Forks
898
No merged PRs in 30d

Getting set up

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from facebookresearch/sam-3d-objects

All issues in facebookresearch/sam-3d-objects

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.