Documentation about REPL workflow
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- clojure
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start by reading the linked forum thread about using a code file from within the Clojure REPL. Determine the supported workflow and document how to use the REPL, with completion marked by clear guidance for this use case.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Someone asked in the forums how to develop using the REPL. This issue is a pointer to that thread.
https://forum.exercism.org/t/using-your-code-file-from-within-repl-classpath-deps-edn-help-doc/15739
It might be a good idea to have some documentation on how to use the REPL. However, it's not really expected that anyone would take that approach, since plenty of editors and IDEs come with integrated REPL functionality.
- Dominant language
- Clojure
- Stars
- 177
- Forks
- 159
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from exercism/clojure
-
exercism/clojure#821 · 1 comment · 1 reaction · 1 assignee ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 20/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
All issues in exercism/clojure
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
.Team/Metabot Priority:P3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
needs triage
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
scalar-labs/scalar-jepsen#222 · 1 comment ·