Linux builds record the deployment target as the SDK version in LC_BUILD_VERSION (no -isysroot at link time)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- ios, linux, swift
- Área
- build-system, mobile-dev
Línea de trabajo
Start in Sources/PackLib/Packer.swift around Plan.Product.linkerSettings (lines 245-271), which currently emits only rpath and entry-point flags, and check whether the generated builder package needs a sysroot flag for non-macOS hosts. Read PR #321 first, since it proposes a fix but is not linked to this issue. Done means a Linux build with a Darwin SDK reports the versioned SDK (e.g. 27.x) in the sdk field of LC_BUILD_VERSION, confirmed with the llvm-objdump --macho --private-headers command from the issue.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Binaries built with xtool on a Linux host record the deployment target in the sdk field of LC_BUILD_VERSION, not the actual SDK they were linked against. App Store Connect enforces a minimum SDK for uploads, so an otherwise-valid build can be rejected just because its Mach-O header claims an old SDK.
What happens
With a Darwin SDK from a current Xcode (say 27.x) and an iOS deployment target of 17.0, a binary built with xtool dev build on Linux gets:
Load command N
cmd LC_BUILD_VERSION
platform IOS
minos 17.0
sdk 17.0 <-- should be 27.x
minos is right; sdk wrongly repeats the deployment target.
Why
xtool's generated builder package passes no sysroot flag to clang at link time. On current main, Plan.Product.linkerSettings (Sources/PackLib/Packer.swift:245-271) only emits -Xlinker -rpath / entry-point flags, and grep -rn "isysroot" Sources/ on main has no hits. The Darwin SDK reaches the linker only via swift-driver's --sysroot, but clang's Darwin driver only reads SDKSettings.json (the only place that records the real SDK version) when it is given -isysroot. Without it, the -platform_version clang hands to the linker carries the deployment target in the SDK slot, and that lands in LC_BUILD_VERSION.
On macOS hosts the Xcode-managed toolchain injects -isysroot itself, so this only shows up on the Linux/WSL path — xtool's headline platform.
Impact
Any iOS binary produced on Linux has a wrong sdk value in LC_BUILD_VERSION. It doesn't affect local device installs, but App Store Connect rejects uploads whose recorded SDK is older than the required minimum — the build gets rejected even though it was actually linked against a current SDK.
Suggested direction
Pass -Xclang-linker -isysroot <SDK> for the app and extension targets of the generated builder package when a Darwin SDK is installed and the host is not macOS, selecting the versioned SDK directory matching the triple (e.g. iPhoneOS27.1.sdk from the installed artifact bundle). The root cause arguably belongs in swift-driver (use -isysroot for Darwin targets), so an upstream report is worth filing too.
I couldn't build on this machine, so the trace above is static; the behavior itself is easy to reproduce on a Linux host with a Darwin SDK:
xtool new Hello && cd Hello && xtool dev build --ipa
llvm-objdump --macho --private-headers xtool/Hello-App.app/Hello-App | grep -A4 LC_BUILD_VERSION
PR #321 proposes a fix along these lines, but I couldn't find an issue tracking the underlying bug, so filing this for visibility. (Searches for isysroot, sysroot, BUILD_VERSION, minimum SDK, App Store Connect found nothing; #117 is the generic "upload builds to App Store" feature request.)
- Lenguaje dominante
- Swift
- Estrellas
- 5.5k
- Forks
- 163
- Merge medio
- 19 h 33 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 25
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de xtool-org/xtool
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 63/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Error: exited(127)Abiertobug
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
xtool-org/xtool#365 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 20/100
xtool-org/xtool#364 · 9 reacciones ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de xtool-org/xtool
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Lakr233/vphone-cli#745 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
cucumberswift/CucumberSwift#495 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Translate the app into ItalianAbiertoenhancement good first issue help wanted
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
omlahore/RemoveMacAI#91 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día