Reposition feature as a generic communication tool?
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- javascript, web-dev
- Área
- api
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading the WebMCP spec and explainers mentioned in the issue, then review the discussion for prior decisions. The proposal explores exposing functions across environments, origins, WebDriver, and service workers, with browser and LLM integrations. Done would require agreeing on scope and a design before implementation.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
I only read through the spec and explainers on a plane, so apologies if this is stuff that's already been discussed.
I wonder if it would be better to reposition this idea as a general way to call functions in other environments.
Right now, it's a pain in the arse to do simple function calls between environments (windows, workers, etc). So much so, that there are popular libraries to try and make it easier.
When I was looking at the API, I thought "haha I could totally abuse this to be like a built-in comlink", but then I thought "maybe it doesn't have to be an abuse".
Let's say the whole tool registering thing is just a way for one environment to expose function calls to another. Then, add in the ability to expose particular functions to particular other origins. There's your comlink.
Then, add in the ability to expose particular functions to "the browser" - this would make the function available via WebDriver, and whatever tooling the browser chooses to provide. This is where the schema and description comes in. This means the browser could expose this functionality via its own interface, and build a form for the parameters. Or, sure, an LLM could do all that transparently. I think it might be an easier sell like this - the LLM capability just falls out of the other capabilities provided.
Developers could simply use this as an easier way to call functions in a worker - nothing to do with LLMs. Or they could do it to expose site functionality to the outside world.
A service worker could register functions at install time, meaning these things can be callable without a window open. They may choose to open a window (or interact with another window). All they'd be doing is calling (probably private) tools on the window. With some feature that allows a tool to return "don't return until I've navigated and the next page is dom-ready" - now you have a single public tool in a service worker that can perform MPA automations.
Just don't call it Web Intents I guess.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Bikeshed
- Estrellas
- 4.7k
- Forks
- 328
- Merge medio
- 2 d 15 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 16
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de webmachinelearning/webmcp
-
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
webmachinelearning/webmcp#360 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Say how an agent should weigh annotations that the page wrote about itselfPosiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
webmachinelearning/webmcp#353 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
webmachinelearning/webmcp#343 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Agenda+ i18n-tracker
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
webmachinelearning/webmcp#273 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
a11y-tracker Agenda+
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
webmachinelearning/webmcp#272 · 4 comentarios · 2 reacciones ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de webmachinelearning/webmcp
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
CLIMADA-project/climada_python#1337 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
client.HTTPFetcher doesn't close non-200 response bodies, so connections leakPosiblemente ocupada @grempe la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
transparency-dev/tessera#1245 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
mattpolzin/harmony#435 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
kristoff-it/ziggy#87 ·
-
listFeatures/getFeatureExamples never return Kotlin examples for Android or server Kotlin SDKsAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
appwrite/mcp-for-docs#23 · 1 comentario ·