Automatic output tracking misses files a task renames into place, so a cache hit restores nothing
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 48/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- node.js, rust
- Área
- build-system, tooling
Línea de trabajo
Start with crates/fspy_preload_unix/src/interceptions/mod.rs to see how filesystem calls are intercepted, then read crates/vt/src/session/cache/archive.rs to understand how recorded outputs are archived. The issue calls out Linux rename, renameat, and renameat2, plus macOS rename and renameat; done means those renames record the destination so a cache hit restores the renamed file or folder contents.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Written by an AI agent (Claude) on behalf of @jasonkuhrt.
Problem
With automatic output tracking, the default when cache.output is omitted or holds { auto: true }, a task that writes its output somewhere else and then renames it into place gets a cache entry without that output. A cache hit then restores nothing.
Writing to a temporary path and renaming is the standard way to replace a file or a folder atomically. TanStack Router's generator writes its route tree this way: a temp file, then rename (safeFileWrite, router-generator/src/generator.ts L1203-L1277). Our own code generators stage a whole folder and rename it over the old one.
Reproduction on vite-plus 1.4.0, with no remote cache:
// vite.config.ts
import { defineConfig } from 'vite-plus';
export default defineConfig({
run: {
tasks: {
generate: {
command: 'node generate.mjs',
cache: { input: ['generate.mjs'] },
},
},
},
});
// generate.mjs: stages the output, then renames it into place
import { mkdirSync, renameSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from 'node:fs';
rmSync('.staging', { recursive: true, force: true });
mkdirSync('.staging');
writeFileSync('.staging/a.ts', 'export const a = 1;\n');
rmSync('generated', { recursive: true, force: true });
renameSync('.staging', 'generated');
$ vp run generate
$ node generate.mjs
$ ls generated
a.ts
$ rm -rf generated
$ vp run generate
vp run: cache hit, 39ms saved.
$ ls generated
ls: generated: No such file or directory # the hit restored nothing
Replacing the renameSync line with a direct writeFileSync('generated/a.ts', …) makes the same hit restore generated/a.ts.
Cause
fspy records the write to .staging/a.ts. It has no rename interception (fspy_preload_unix/src/interceptions/mod.rs covers access, dirent, open, spawn and stat), so generated/a.ts is never recorded. When outputs are archived, the recorded .staging/a.ts no longer exists and is skipped (archive.rs L29-L34), which leaves the entry empty.
The workaround today is a positive cache.output glob for the destination. But a glob archives whatever matches on disk, including files a previous run left there, so it gives up what automatic tracking gets right.
Proposal: cover the common case, leave the long tail to explicit config
Record a rename's destination as a write:
- A file renamed to
dst:dstis written. - A folder renamed to
dst: every file underdstis written. These can be collected by walkingdstwhen outputs are archived, instead of tracking each file inside.
Covering rename, renameat and renameat2 on Linux and rename and renameat on macOS should catch nearly every atomic-write tool, since that is how Node's fs.rename and most tools' atomic writers move files.
Deliberately out of scope, where users keep declaring cache.output:
RENAME_EXCHANGE;- moving files into place with
link; - platforms or syscalls the interception layer doesn't reach yet.
Cross-filesystem moves need nothing, since they copy and so are already recorded as writes.
Related: #904 covers the cache-hit side, where a hit leaves behind files the cached run did not write.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 480
- Forks
- 50
- Merge medio
- 1 d 5 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 63
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de voidzero-dev/vite-task
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
voidzero-dev/vite-task#921 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 56/100
voidzero-dev/vite-task#910 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Export OpenTelemetry client spans for the native remote cachePosiblemente ocupada @jasonkuhrt la tomó hace 1 día. Abierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
voidzero-dev/vite-task#906 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 56/100
voidzero-dev/vite-task#905 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
voidzero-dev/vite-task#904 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de voidzero-dev/vite-task
Issues similares
-
ai_p2 bug comp-datalake
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
ClickHouse/ClickHouse#128306 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
documentation
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:cli bug priority:medium
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
rtk-ai/rtk#4862 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día