Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Automatic output tracking misses files a task renames into place, so a cache hit restores nothing

Abierto
#908 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
48/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bien especificado
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
node.js, rust

Línea de trabajo

Start with crates/fspy_preload_unix/src/interceptions/mod.rs to see how filesystem calls are intercepted, then read crates/vt/src/session/cache/archive.rs to understand how recorded outputs are archived. The issue calls out Linux rename, renameat, and renameat2, plus macOS rename and renameat; done means those renames record the destination so a cache hit restores the renamed file or folder contents.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

Written by an AI agent (Claude) on behalf of @jasonkuhrt.

Problem

With automatic output tracking, the default when cache.output is omitted or holds { auto: true }, a task that writes its output somewhere else and then renames it into place gets a cache entry without that output. A cache hit then restores nothing.

Writing to a temporary path and renaming is the standard way to replace a file or a folder atomically. TanStack Router's generator writes its route tree this way: a temp file, then rename (safeFileWrite, router-generator/src/generator.ts L1203-L1277). Our own code generators stage a whole folder and rename it over the old one.

Reproduction on vite-plus 1.4.0, with no remote cache:

// vite.config.ts
import { defineConfig } from 'vite-plus';

export default defineConfig({
  run: {
    tasks: {
      generate: {
        command: 'node generate.mjs',
        cache: { input: ['generate.mjs'] },
      },
    },
  },
});
// generate.mjs: stages the output, then renames it into place
import { mkdirSync, renameSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from 'node:fs';

rmSync('.staging', { recursive: true, force: true });
mkdirSync('.staging');
writeFileSync('.staging/a.ts', 'export const a = 1;\n');
rmSync('generated', { recursive: true, force: true });
renameSync('.staging', 'generated');
$ vp run generate
$ node generate.mjs
$ ls generated
a.ts

$ rm -rf generated
$ vp run generate
vp run: cache hit, 39ms saved.
$ ls generated
ls: generated: No such file or directory      # the hit restored nothing

Replacing the renameSync line with a direct writeFileSync('generated/a.ts', …) makes the same hit restore generated/a.ts.

Cause

fspy records the write to .staging/a.ts. It has no rename interception (fspy_preload_unix/src/interceptions/mod.rs covers access, dirent, open, spawn and stat), so generated/a.ts is never recorded. When outputs are archived, the recorded .staging/a.ts no longer exists and is skipped (archive.rs L29-L34), which leaves the entry empty.

The workaround today is a positive cache.output glob for the destination. But a glob archives whatever matches on disk, including files a previous run left there, so it gives up what automatic tracking gets right.

Proposal: cover the common case, leave the long tail to explicit config

Record a rename's destination as a write:

  • A file renamed to dst: dst is written.
  • A folder renamed to dst: every file under dst is written. These can be collected by walking dst when outputs are archived, instead of tracking each file inside.

Covering rename, renameat and renameat2 on Linux and rename and renameat on macOS should catch nearly every atomic-write tool, since that is how Node's fs.rename and most tools' atomic writers move files.

Deliberately out of scope, where users keep declaring cache.output:

  • RENAME_EXCHANGE;
  • moving files into place with link;
  • platforms or syscalls the interception layer doesn't reach yet.

Cross-filesystem moves need nothing, since they copy and so are already recorded as writes.

Related: #904 covers the cache-hit side, where a hit leaves behind files the cached run did not write.

Lenguaje dominante
Rust
Estrellas
480
Forks
50
Merge medio
1 d 5 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
63

Preparar el entorno

Abrir en Codespaces

Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de voidzero-dev/vite-task

Todos los issues de voidzero-dev/vite-task

Issues similares

Más issues de Rust

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.