Proposal: host-side AffixIO attestation alongside ADR observe/detect/prevent
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading the README sections on Prevention and the Sensor schema; the issue does not identify specific files or tests. The first step is to get maintainer direction on whether this belongs in documentation, a Sensor schema change, or a local example, and whether to wait for Prevention OSS. Done would require an agreed scope and a minimal contribution matching it.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Summary
AffixIO can sit next to ADR as complementary host-side signed ACTION yes/no proof for consequential agent tool calls. ADR already observes activity, detects threats, and (in product) prevents unsafe actions. AffixIO would not replace that loop. It would add signed allow/deny evidence ADR can cite in detection/response, and optionally gate unsafe tool calls with host proof before execution.
Happy to stop at discussion, or contribute a minimal example if maintainers want one.
Why this fits
ADR Discovery/Sensor/Detection already cover inventory, telemetry, and threat detection. Prevention is called out in the README but is not in the current open-source release. Host-side attestation is a natural companion:
- ADR sees what the agent did or tried to do.
- AffixIO signs a concrete ACTION allow/deny decision on the host.
- Detection/response can treat that signature as citeable evidence, not another opaque policy black box.
Scope lock for AffixIO here: PII stays on the host. This is not person/age/KYC identity.
Product surface (AffixIO)
- Host-side signed ACTION yes/no via
npm i affixio - Local stdio MCP:
@affixio/[email protected] - Docs: https://www.affix-io.com/ and https://hub.affix-io.com/onboarding/
Proposed sit (no full wrap)
Optional complementary path only:
- Before a consequential tool call executes, request AffixIO host attestation for that ACTION.
- If denied, do not execute; emit signed deny evidence into the ADR observability/detection trail.
- If allowed, proceed and attach signed allow evidence so ADR Detection can cite it later.
This stays outside ADR core. No proposal to vendor AffixIO into Discovery/Sensor/Detection, and no full SDK wrap of ADR.
Ask for maintainers
- Does complementary host-side attestation belong in ADR's open-source direction (docs/example note, Sensor schema field for attestations, or wait until Prevention OSS lands)?
- If useful, would you prefer a short docs note plus a minimal local example under something like
Sensor/examples/, or hold until Prevention is public? - Any schema constraints for attaching signed evidence to Sensor events without bloating the unified telemetry model?
If maintainers want a minimal example, AffixIO can provide a small FIT-for-PR sketch (local stdio MCP + signed ACTION gate stub) and stop there. No large wrap planned.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 2.1k
- Forks
- 230
- Merge medio
- 16 h 8 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 2
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de uber/ADR
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 20/100
uber/ADR#163 · 4 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 32/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Issues similares
-
Input: placeholder drawn in the text colour when the empty Input is focused but not yet editedAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
pierreaubert/gpui-toolkit#114 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
intake mcp-intake needs-human-review priority:high type:bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
Ikalus1988/MisakaNet#4903 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 64/100
FinanceFlash/unvibecode#819 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día